Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
9. And? What does that mean, exactly? Other than the clear fact that it is an admission
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:01 PM
Dec 2012

that this 'change' will be a cut and a sacrifice by those who are on fixed incomes?
This whole thing is a right winger's wet dream.
This year, the average SS COLA increase is $21. Do you feel comfortable wanting to knock that down a bit more, really?
The idea of a nation that put two wars of choice off the books and on credit without so much as a thought about it doing something like this is shameful. Pathetic and indicative of decaying culture.

More means testing paperwork hell. Amak8 Dec 2012 #1
Probably means, the vulnerable get 105% of whatever closeupready Dec 2012 #2
Yeah ... right. GeorgeGist Dec 2012 #3
Exactly the scam I predicted: woo me with science Dec 2012 #4
If you need Social Security to live on you are upaloopa Dec 2012 #5
Are those the only two classes of recipients? jberryhill Dec 2012 #10
The correct term is 'beneficaries'. The two words do not mean the same things. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #17
Not comforting. WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2012 #6
DU rec...nt SidDithers Dec 2012 #7
Yeah, let's implement a right-wing scam. It's just fine as long as we exempt a few people. woo me with science Dec 2012 #8
And? What does that mean, exactly? Other than the clear fact that it is an admission Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #9
Those are b.s. words from the WH Larkspur Dec 2012 #11
Thank you. Note how the expectations of our party are constantly shifted woo me with science Dec 2012 #14
+1 leftstreet Dec 2012 #16
Okay, so you pick and choose which ones are "BS" jberryhill Dec 2012 #18
You are the one making the assertion that this phrase mitigates cutting Social Security. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #23
+1 HiPointDem Dec 2012 #22
really? I'd love to know how he could possibly do that. It's lying dog shit. cali Dec 2012 #12
a la "the most vulnerable can go to the ER for all healthcare needs" jsr Dec 2012 #13
OP seems to have left the building with an attache case filled with terms of art. Bluenorthwest Dec 2012 #15
That's nothing more than a throwaway line. Anyone who is paying attention Autumn Dec 2012 #19
"Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me". nt jody Dec 2012 #20
Nothing is good enough for the reactionary left and right. nt Comrade_McKenzie Dec 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"he would make sure ...»Reply #9