Since the origional source is Parade Magazine from Jan 14, 1990, that is the best source (Reply #7)

In the discussion thread: The Second Amendment Has Nothing to Do with Gun Ownership [View all]

Response to liberal N proud (Original post)

Fri Dec 28, 2012, 09:59 AM

7. Since the origional source is Parade Magazine from Jan 14, 1990, that is the best source

to review for determining whether Dailykos accurately repeated former Justice Burger's words.

http://www.guncite.com/burger.html

Did Dailykos do that?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

72 replies	Author	Time	Post
The Second Amendment Has Nothing to Do with Gun Ownership [View all]	liberal N proud	Dec 2012	OP
Well, that's about the lamest, most cherry picked interpretation of the 2nd amendment I've seen	MadHound	Dec 2012	#1
So you are a constitutional scholar?	liberal N proud	Dec 2012	#2
Umm, you did notice the second part of the Second Amendment, didn't you?	MadHound	Dec 2012	#3
well, that "some retired judge" was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United	CTyankee	Dec 2012	#12
As published by Parade magazine, and paraphrased by Daily Kos,	MadHound	Dec 2012	#13
Do you have any research to the contrary? Please let me know instead of relying on	CTyankee	Dec 2012	#24
And the same judge who thought that anti-sodomy laws were constitutional, the death penalty was a-ok	X_Digger	Dec 2012	#23
we are not talking about his opinion about anti-sodomy laws and the death penalty, now	CTyankee	Dec 2012	#25
So his opinion has value only when he agrees with you? That the size of it?	X_Digger	Dec 2012	#41
I'm seeing a pattern here...	derby378	Dec 2012	#53
same goes for you...	CTyankee	Dec 2012	#59
oh, don't be tiresome. I agreed with something he said. So what.	CTyankee	Dec 2012	#57
Don't hold him up as an expert if you're not going to stand behind that..	X_Digger	Dec 2012	#61
You know more about constitutional law than he did, obviously...	CTyankee	Dec 2012	#62
It doesn't take an expert to see that he despised individual rights, generally.	X_Digger	Dec 2012	#63
Oh, of course I will my dearest. Anything to please you!	CTyankee	Dec 2012	#64
this is the problem with binary thinking right here..	frylock	Dec 2012	#60
He's only representing that those words were those of a judge published in Parade Magazine.	AnotherMcIntosh	Dec 2012	#16
you make excellent points in your OP	samsingh	Dec 2012	#26
I'm not. So I won't address Burger's legal claims; other more qualified people already have.	Lizzie Poppet	Dec 2012	#29
You are being conned.	AnotherMcIntosh	Dec 2012	#32
Ah, so it's a false citation?	Lizzie Poppet	Dec 2012	#33
Apparently someone at Dailykos made this up, and then at least two OPs have been created	AnotherMcIntosh	Dec 2012	#35
Amen	pipoman	Dec 2012	#6
He's not relying upon the actual language published in Parade Magazine and attributed to Burger.	AnotherMcIntosh	Dec 2012	#11
MadHound I must angrily disagree with your subject. I don't believe OP is that good. nt	jody	Dec 2012	#27
I accept the President's position that it is an individual right.	hack89	Dec 2012	#4
Not a gun owner myself	Puzzledtraveller	Dec 2012	#58
I have yet to find someone who states	pipoman	Dec 2012	#5
Since the origional source is Parade Magazine from Jan 14, 1990, that is the best source	AnotherMcIntosh	Dec 2012	#7
Until 2008 the OP has it correct. Morton Grove, IL, for example was able to ban handguns. The	byeya	Dec 2012	#8
State rights rule!	hack89	Dec 2012	#15
agreed	samsingh	Dec 2012	#51
liberal N proud, don't let this folks get you down. Thanks for the informative contribution.	ywcachieve	Dec 2012	#9
If facts matter, his informative contribution was to republish something that was untrue	AnotherMcIntosh	Dec 2012	#17
I agree with OP. Doesn't matter though, even Scalia agrees restrictions are OK. Let's pass them.	Hoyt	Dec 2012	#10
Respectfully disagree.	H2O Man	Dec 2012	#14
The 2002 9th circuit opinion	buzzroller	Dec 2012	#18
I am the King of France	slackmaster	Dec 2012	#19
Only if I get to be the reincarnation of Emperor Norton I of the United States	derby378	Dec 2012	#54
A good, lengthy, scholarly book review regarding this topic, "To Keep and Bear Arms" by Garry Wills	yodermon	Dec 2012	#20
Here's the problem with opinions...they are only that...	jmg257	Dec 2012	#31
Isn't there something wrong with this math? "State militias = National Guard"?	jmg257	Dec 2012	#21
Laurence Tribe was persuaded, before Heller. Yet another GOP ideologue?	eallen	Dec 2012	#22
Reservist in the Swiss Army are permitted to store military weaponry in their homes.	Aristus	Dec 2012	#28
Congress has all the authority it needs for the militia in Article I, Section 8, clauses 15 & 16.	jody	Dec 2012	#30
Scholarly discussion of the 2nd Amendment	bongbong	Dec 2012	#34
bongbong the best review of both sides of RKBA debate is Heller opinion and dissents and the many	jody	Dec 2012	#36
More insults from the Delicate Flowers	bongbong	Dec 2012	#38
No one has to impugn your intelligence but you do have an opportunity to read the material I	jody	Dec 2012	#42
LOL	bongbong	Dec 2012	#45
"yo mama" trash talk doesn't bother me. You use the same old insults so readers will start ignoring	jody	Dec 2012	#48
"More insults" as you call anyone that disagrees with you a	rl6214	Dec 2012	#47
Not everybody	bongbong	Dec 2012	#50
I don't know what a "Tom Tomorrow" is but it doesn't take a rocket scientist	rl6214	Dec 2012	#67
The folks who own gun shops and sell guns are loving all this anti-gun BS.	crazyjoe	Dec 2012	#37
That's	bongbong	Dec 2012	#39
gun sales are through the roof, real funny.	crazyjoe	Dec 2012	#65
Yes!	bongbong	Dec 2012	#66
what's with the delicate flower crap? grow up	crazyjoe	Jan 2013	#68
It's a term to sooth super-sensitive gun-lovers	bongbong	Jan 2013	#70
well, that's pretty immature and stupid.	crazyjoe	Jan 2013	#71
LOL	bongbong	Jan 2013	#72
Let's try this with the Establishment clause.	Igel	Dec 2012	#40
IMO some on both sides are incoherent.	jody	Dec 2012	#43
I don't think even the dissenting justices in Heller believe that	aikoaiko	Dec 2012	#44
I agree!	bongbong	Dec 2012	#46
I see you're still trying trying to contribute something meaningful.	aikoaiko	Dec 2012	#52
Yes!	bongbong	Dec 2012	#56
aikoaiko I'm disappointed that almost none of the anti-RKBA group have read the Heller opinion and	jody	Dec 2012	#49
Burger did not issue the opinion which is now falsely being attributed to him.	AnotherMcIntosh	Dec 2012	#55
I don't give a fuck about the meaning of the second amendment	TRJuan	Jan 2013	#69

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.