Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I think a list of homes to rob for guns is a bigger issue Marrah_G Dec 2012 #1
Lots of guns aren't worth breaking into a house for. Robb Dec 2012 #7
What about revealing the addresses of women hiding from abusive ex-husbands? hack89 Dec 2012 #11
The crocodile is weeping... Pholus Dec 2012 #13
Don't the journalists have some responsibility to ask such questions? hack89 Dec 2012 #14
I ask gun owners that question all the time. Pholus Dec 2012 #15
In my case the answer is no. hack89 Dec 2012 #17
You're all legal till you're not. Pholus Dec 2012 #19
The same can be said for those that drink alcohol - we are all potential drunk drivers. hack89 Dec 2012 #27
Mass shooters, nearly to a man, got their weapons legally. Robb Dec 2012 #32
Drunk drivers, nearly to a person, got their booze legally. hack89 Dec 2012 #36
Difference: theKed Dec 2012 #56
We enact laws to punish people that shoot other people hack89 Dec 2012 #64
Teatotaller so "Option C" I guess. He swings, he misses! Pholus Dec 2012 #38
I just see the risks to my family differently then you do hack89 Dec 2012 #39
That's better. Page 38. Pholus Dec 2012 #41
In 2009, there were 10,839 fatalities in crashes involving a driver with a BAC of .08 or higher hack89 Dec 2012 #43
Wow, a whole 15% difference! Pholus Dec 2012 #58
Which is exactly my point hack89 Dec 2012 #63
So the guy in post #39 was a liar? Pholus Dec 2012 #66
NRA Talking Points bongbong Dec 2012 #67
Mass shootings are rare events hack89 Dec 2012 #69
Ah, so we're all "Latte Liberals" then? Pholus Dec 2012 #74
No - stop trying so hard to be offended hack89 Dec 2012 #75
Then stop trying to offend. Pholus Dec 2012 #76
Disagreeing with you is not trying to offend. hack89 Dec 2012 #79
Namecalling accusations? Page 68, NRA Playbook. Pholus Dec 2012 #97
Now that we have reached the "blah blah NRA blah blah Right Wing" stage hack89 Dec 2012 #102
Don't need it. Have a good evening yourself. nt. Pholus Dec 2012 #103
By equal analogy, drunks ploughing into mass transit... TheMadMonk Dec 2012 #127
The NRA would love to have guns regulated like cars. hack89 Dec 2012 #132
i agree oddoneout Dec 2012 #42
gunlovers do the following: samsingh Dec 2012 #77
I was thinking about starting a thread listing all the debate tactics. Pholus Dec 2012 #86
it would be good to start it , i'm sure samsingh Dec 2012 #89
You'd have to do more than that. Pholus Dec 2012 #99
Yawn. Same shit. Different day. closeupready Dec 2012 #90
do you? samsingh Dec 2012 #91
I get tired of the same shit you bring here every day, yes. closeupready Dec 2012 #92
i'm pretty tired of your ignorant crap samsingh Dec 2012 #93
lol, you are a genius, Wile E. Coyote - closeupready Dec 2012 #94
This message was self-deleted by its author samsingh Dec 2012 #95
don't respond to my posts if you can't handle an intelligent comment samsingh Dec 2012 #96
Gun haters have their own set. beevul Dec 2012 #107
doesn't that argument run counter to the gun humper argument.. frylock Dec 2012 #70
Since I don't own a gun, I can't answer that Marrah_G Dec 2012 #85
your your positing an opinion on something you have no knowledge of.. frylock Dec 2012 #100
No, I am posting my opinion about an article here on DU Marrah_G Dec 2012 #109
Burglary is a crime rucky Dec 2012 #137
Well, Sherman A1 Dec 2012 #2
And that includes so called journalists ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #48
Yes, but for some reason a lot of people can't see that. NaturalHigh Dec 2012 #61
for pete's sake FightForMichigan Dec 2012 #130
Right to Privacy? NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #105
Right to free speech? Sherman A1 Dec 2012 #108
I doubt posting the information of other people is "free speech". NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #111
It was because it was public information, then again so is the data being posted on the people ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #112
And that information shouldn't have been public. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #115
I agree ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #118
I expected there would be retaliation. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #120
It a trick that has been tried before with similar results ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #121
It had negative consequences in California and Wisconsin too. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #122
As stated it is a matter of Public Record Sherman A1 Dec 2012 #117
Vehicle registration is not public in most states. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #119
Vehicle and real estate Sherman A1 Dec 2012 #123
Not available to the public. NutmegYankee Dec 2012 #124
You do realize Sherman A1 Dec 2012 #129
No, what I see are a bunch of homes being broken into while nobody is home, MadHound Dec 2012 #3
Here's hoping they are bounty-hunters who will visit the gun-buy-back events SoCalDem Dec 2012 #4
It takes a sick, sick person to wish a robbery of any sort, MadHound Dec 2012 #10
I thought all responsible gun-owners kept their weapons locked up in a safe, madinmaryland Dec 2012 #26
The thieves can take other stuff you know - most are very flexible that way. nt hack89 Dec 2012 #28
how does that relate to the discussion we're having.. frylock Dec 2012 #72
Thieves come looking for guns to steal hack89 Dec 2012 #73
but having a gun is alleged to be a deterrent to such occurances.. frylock Dec 2012 #83
Only when a person is actually in the house hack89 Dec 2012 #87
third base.. frylock Dec 2012 #101
That's not going to do much for the rest of your stuff... Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #50
i would sue the shit out of whoever was incapable of securing their guns.. frylock Dec 2012 #71
I would sue them also. nt Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #80
Tough shit.. pipoman Dec 2012 #5
bang SoCalDem Dec 2012 #6
Why in the world are people being stalked by abusers funny to you?! obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #82
I just had a Nixon flashback. Robb Dec 2012 #9
Thank you for that. NaturalHigh Dec 2012 #62
My first thought, too obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #81
Gun culture tells us that armed homes are safer. Now they want us to believe they aren't. Hoyt Dec 2012 #8
Only when there are people in them. nt hack89 Dec 2012 #12
Actually, if I am house hunting, I would like information avebury Dec 2012 #16
I would not want to buy in a neighborhood like that and I would LIKE to see a map SoCalDem Dec 2012 #18
I am kind of wondering if you can submit an avebury Dec 2012 #20
Realtors could use the info as a selling feature.. SoCalDem Dec 2012 #21
If the government keeps such a record musiclawyer Dec 2012 #23
Yes nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #52
There is no such thing as an accurate gun ownership map - lynne Dec 2012 #136
This is more complicated than you think musiclawyer Dec 2012 #22
Some women buy and register guns because they are being stalked or threatened. WilliamPitt Dec 2012 #24
You think this list has what, witness protection program people on it? Robb Dec 2012 #31
Probably a few battered women who are living in rented apartments and aren't listed in a phone book slackmaster Dec 2012 #33
The gun lobby's sudden interest in violence against women is welcome. Robb Dec 2012 #35
The gun lobby doesn't object to the law saying that people who are subject to restraining orders... slackmaster Dec 2012 #37
Wait. Robb Dec 2012 #46
Laws work only to the extent that people obey them slackmaster Dec 2012 #47
+1 obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #84
So... gun owners are paranoid, confrontational, and likely to get violent? Buzz Clik Dec 2012 #25
They are as paranoid, confrontational and prone to violence as everyone. Robb Dec 2012 #29
nope.. no one I know has a gun SoCalDem Dec 2012 #30
In other words, you made it all up and you don't care. Okay Buzz Clik Dec 2012 #34
Wah-wah, the poor, poor journalists. MicaelS Dec 2012 #40
And your tribe fucking shoots people. Robb Dec 2012 #44
Actually it is the media's high ground that is nonsense ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #49
I agree. closeupready Dec 2012 #53
My lord nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #57
Hmm...probably a good reason why you don't want to piss off most people, jmg257 Dec 2012 #45
BS bluerum Dec 2012 #51
That's just the way it goes. closeupready Dec 2012 #54
Been watching this with considerable interest... ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #55
So one violation of privacy is fine... NaturalHigh Dec 2012 #59
This and other distractions such as renewing AWB highlights how misguided those jody Dec 2012 #60
Just FYI... NaturalHigh Dec 2012 #65
I couldn't agree with you more. tradecenter Dec 2012 #68
so you have no sympathy for the guy that drops off newspapers for distibution.. frylock Dec 2012 #98
I see plenty of calls for collective punishment right here on DU. MicaelS Dec 2012 #104
The information of delivery drivers was posted? NaturalHigh Dec 2012 #113
I see the names and addresses of abused men and women obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #78
KNR...what bothers me about publishing the journalists' names is that it was vengeance joeybee12 Dec 2012 #88
Agreed Piazza Riforma Dec 2012 #106
No, two wrongs don't make a right... NaturalHigh Dec 2012 #114
Exactly how are they "bullying" these people? Piazza Riforma Dec 2012 #128
Do you really believe that the paper posted these addresses just to inform the public? NaturalHigh Dec 2012 #135
Hey FightForMichigan Dec 2012 #131
Help me understand the logic here shadowrider Dec 2012 #133
That was my problem with the dox: it was too broad. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #116
Vengence with an implicit threat of violence. Stochastic terrorism. ehrenfeucht games Dec 2012 #126
None have been shot at yet shadowrider Dec 2012 #134
Goose meet gander. OneTenthofOnePercent Dec 2012 #110
First comes before Second malz Dec 2012 #125
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Listing names of gun owne...»Reply #81