Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 06:48 PM Dec 2012

OB/GYNs Pulled In Two Directions In Rare Fiscal Cliff / New year Dilemma [View all]



12/31/2012 AP -

Expect your morning paper or favorite news program to feature the "first baby born in 2013" tomorrow, complete with gushing parents and maternity staff. But don't dig too far into the story. The "first baby born" story has long become a journalistic filler story, in the company of bus plunges and the world's oldest man or woman dying. Readers have figured out that those two stories run every couple of weeks or months.

It has become so reliable a story, in fact, that stories long deemed apocryphal about "slow down, we have thirty more seconds 'till midnight" have, in a sense been true, and a reflection on the American obsession with the pursuit of celebrity. Before the advent of national news that reflected the same fascination with what had previously been local stories, your morning paper would have the news of little Julie who was born at one of your nearby hospitals at, say, 1:30 AM.

But no more. As health care has become more competitive, and with parents of the maternity-as-reality-show mindset proliferated, there was what might be called an "accidental conspiracy".

"We'd always get some saying, 'Can we get him out by midnight so we can claim him as a deduction for this year?'" says Dr. Donald Duque, the head of obstetrics of Jefferson Hospital in Philadelpha, "But then we'd start getting calls from local news stations looking for parking permits for their satellite vans and suddenly every woman in labor and her husband want to be on TV. And the administrators let them park, cross their fingers and wink at us. We've been offered bonuses and tips to go to a C-section, while people are making sure are clocks are right to the second."

But this year, obstetricians, unlike their patients, are being pulled in two directions. With the fiscal cliff looming, more couples are keeping an eye on the clock and looking to claim those deductions and credits while they can.

Complicating the "local story as national story" aspect of the "first baby of the year" is, which time zone counts? From a strictly chronological standpoint the first baby born in the Eastern time zone is born before the first baby in the Pacific time zone, so sometimes the story will run with contenders for the title in different time zones, states, or whatever appeals to a local editor fleshing out the national wire stories.

"Oh, we get asked about that one every year," chuckled Dr. Sam Iohuneli, of Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, "but you know, nobody is watching the clock." According to Dr. Iohuneli, there can sometimes be a round of "who got the time on that?" when filling out the paperwork after the fact, and sometimes a guess might be one year or it might be the other. This is particularly true among the growing number of home births where the information for the birth certificate is provided by a family witness. "From our perspective, we are here to treat our patients and provide public health services, so the details on the birth certificate are not the first priority."
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OB/GYNs Pulled In Two Dir...