General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Teabaggers are, by definition, Anarchists [View all]patrice
(47,992 posts)But my strongest concerns have to do with how I guess that anarchists would not be particularly supportive of NATIONAL health care in any form. Though I understand and agree that some level of anarchy is good for people, and it isn't something that we can just turn on and then turn off, it should be more present than that, I don't know how you get from anarchy to (preferably Single Payer) Health Care for everyone, except through many many many many cycles from the bottom up, and many of us don't have that kind of time.
I actually do favor the concept of anarchy, but I think our occupy was pretty dominated by a bunch of people reading the tea-leaves about cannabis legalization, so that made us a strange brew with Rand Paul-style gun advocates, and Tea Party racists, thrown in amongst poor-to-upper-middle-class anarchists, Constitutionalists, street people, what subsequently became emo progs, IWW, students . . . camp and the GAs tended to be dominated pretty easily, by whomever, for whatever. It was toooooooooo anarchic. Not good for people.