General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tennessee Supreme Court Considers Whether Minor Is An Accomplice In Her Own Statutory Rape [View all]CreekDog
(46,192 posts)compare the juror's defense of the post to other defenses in this thread, where a similar post was defended.
same thinking, same type of language, same reasoning, same terminology.
but i have no idea.
At Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:22 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
She should not be prosecuted, ridiculous. The idea that she's a victim is absurd
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2261452
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
YOUR COMMENTS:
The poster is actually saying this is okay.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:31 PM, and voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This whole case is abhorrent. But the poster is not attacking anyone, not violating TOS, not doing anything but expressing an opinion. I don't like it either, but that doesn't mean it should be hidden by anyone but those offended...that is what your "hide thread" button is for.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given