General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Atheist teen kicks some ass in the name of the separation of church and state [View all]hfojvt
(37,573 posts)or home school your children.
That's the same option you are offering to parents who don't like the education you advocate.
As far as "solid Supreme Court legal precedence" well, we on the left do not seem to accept that when we don't like the results as in the "personhood of corporations.
Those who disagree with the precedence go back to where it began. Was the 5-4 decision in Everson correct? They don't think it was, and I think they have a point. Before Everson, the Bible and prayer were Constitutional for 159 years and SCOTUS over-turned that precedence without basing that reversal on a change in the Constitution, other than a change that was made 79 years earlier. A change that was made without the intention to do what SCOTUS claimed it did.
That future courts continue to build on that precedence is kinda irrelevant if that precedence itself is faulty, as I believe it to be.
At least I am not seeing a logical argument that shows it was not faulty.
As for "majoritarian arguments" I call that democracy, one of the primary principles of our government. Of course, that is not, nor should it be, absolute. For example, a majority cannot vote to stone me to death just because that majority thinks I make annoying arguments on the internets, (at least I think they cannot, but I forgot about article 7224 Section C, er, ah, ... hide) but in general I think majority rule is better than minority rule, no matter how much the minority might not like it.