Wouldn't the admins mainly base their decision to revoke on the offending member's posts? (Reply #7)

Fri Mar 1, 2013, 01:13 AM

FarCenter (19,429 posts)

Jury comments tend to be highly variable depending on the jurors that happen to be in any given jury.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

13 replies	Author	Time	Post
Please Take the Time to Make Comments When You're on a Jury [View all]	dballance	Feb 2013	OP
Guilty! Guilty! Guilty! nt	Deep13	Feb 2013	#1
alerters need to grow a thick skin	2Design	Feb 2013	#2
You are Off Topic and I hope others don't further you comment.	dballance	Feb 2013	#4
I agree	RudynJack	Mar 2013	#10
Comment field should be mandatory....not giving one is lazy at best , and unhelpful as you say. Nt	pkdu	Feb 2013	#3
Given the discussion in Meta over some jury comments, it is not surprising to see fewer comments	ProgressiveProfessor	Mar 2013	#5
That Excuse is Bunk. If One is Too Afraid to Have Their Honest Comments Associated W/ Them Don't...	dballance	Mar 2013	#8
Your title indicates that you think jurors should be publicly identified.	ProgressiveProfessor	Mar 2013	#9
No. It Does Not. You Are a Terrible Charlatan.	dballance	Mar 2013	#12
No Comment	cbrer	Mar 2013	#6
Wouldn't the admins mainly base their decision to revoke on the offending member's posts?	FarCenter	Mar 2013	#7
I always read for context...	Kalidurga	Mar 2013	#11
Locked - This doesn't fit the GD SOP...	Violet_Crumble	Mar 2013	#13

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.