Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"Is Antonin Scalia the Vilest Person in Washington?" [View all]
Is Antonin Scalia the Vilest Person in Washington?By Steven Rosenfeld at AlterNet
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/antonin-scalia-vilest-person-washington?akid=10137.66032.gNJmfM&rd=1&src=newsletter804214&t=3
"SNIP.....................................................
A day after Justice Antonin Scalia caused gasps in the Supreme Court gallery by saying the 1965 Voting Rights Act had become a racial entitlement no congressperson could vote against, Rachel Maddow toldThe Daily Show she was in the courtroom and Scalia clearly enjoyed tormenting people. I think he does know how that sounds, she said. Hes a troll. Hes saying this for effect. He knows its offensive.
Theres no shortage of badly behaving Republicans in Washington. Theres the take-or-leave-it congressional leadership, who constantly show they value rightwing ideology more than its impact on people. There are intransigent obstructionists, like the NRAs Wayne LaPierre, who believes the answer to gun violence is more guns. But Scalia isnt simply another Republican bully; he may be the most venal and fascist Republican of all.
Its one thing to be a political bully and enjoy it, as Scalia does. But its another to say that the other branches of government are broken because theyre not doing things he agrees with; and then abuse the power of his office to overthrow that governance and perpetuate his legacy. Thats close to how European despots acted before World War II.
Lets unpack what Scalia said about the 1965 Voting Rights Act with an eye to seeing his method, not just his madness. It is the same backstory to his mocking outbursts over the years, whether telling law school students asking about Bush v. Gore to get over it, or arrogantly answering questions put by other justices to lawyerssuch as 2008's Heller case where he coached libertarian lawyers and then wrote the opinion that for the first time in U.S. history said the Second Amendment included a personal right to a handgun at home.
.....................................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
21 replies, 3949 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (29)
ReplyReply to this post
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rand Paul would be. At this point David Duke is not there, but his clone Rand is.
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#5
Ahhhhh, but see, he's a real hero to our "pro gun progressives"* thanks to the "Heller"
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#14