General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hans Blix on the terrible mistake of the Iraq war. [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)The terms that Iraq had to abide by were what was required of them by the cease fire at the end of the first gulf war. The other side of that is, if Iraq violated those terms, the cease fire was no longer in effect and hostilities from the first gulf war, which were UN sanctioned, could be resumed at any time by any UN member nation seeking to force Iraq to obey the applicable UN resolutions.
The Bush cabal, in fact, argues this point in terms of trying to assert the war that began in 2003 was not an illegal one.
The problem for them is, the UN Weapons Inspectors WERE let back in and they did not find any weapons that violated the cease fire resolutions. So the resolutions were not violated and the cease fire WAS in effect with no UN approval for hostilities.