Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Rule [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)53. Bills do not get "judicial review" as a matter of course. That only happens if
someone makes a case and runs it thru the judicial system. Some times it takes many years. I do not believe that Congress worries about that. If they pass a law they believe in and the courts strike it down, then they did as much as they can. You are suggesting that they give the bill a "judicial review" themselves. No way.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Every gun I've bought AR15, AK47s, Mini 14s, I've never had a background check.
bahrbearian
Apr 2013
#8
You cant be series. "I think it failed for constitutional reasons," Really, REALLY!!
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#45
Bills do not get "judicial review" as a matter of course. That only happens if
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#53
Listen Fool, private sales do not require Background checks, you just admitted to that ..
bahrbearian
Apr 2013
#78
The issue and the problem is guns are easily available to anyone. We need to license them in the ex
robinlynne
Apr 2013
#71
impossible? it's happening all over the world with good results. (Australia)
robinlynne
Apr 2013
#73
Hey it was once a dream that blacks and whites could sit together and have lunch.
robinlynne
Apr 2013
#74
And there you are, first post! Wow, and do you ever miss the point. The RW/NRA thanks you!
morningfog
Apr 2013
#35