Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Rule [View all]Progressive dog
(6,899 posts)62. LOL
Every rational person who has read this thread did come to all those "ridiculous" conclusions.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Every gun I've bought AR15, AK47s, Mini 14s, I've never had a background check.
bahrbearian
Apr 2013
#8
You cant be series. "I think it failed for constitutional reasons," Really, REALLY!!
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#45
Bills do not get "judicial review" as a matter of course. That only happens if
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#53
Listen Fool, private sales do not require Background checks, you just admitted to that ..
bahrbearian
Apr 2013
#78
The issue and the problem is guns are easily available to anyone. We need to license them in the ex
robinlynne
Apr 2013
#71
impossible? it's happening all over the world with good results. (Australia)
robinlynne
Apr 2013
#73
Hey it was once a dream that blacks and whites could sit together and have lunch.
robinlynne
Apr 2013
#74
And there you are, first post! Wow, and do you ever miss the point. The RW/NRA thanks you!
morningfog
Apr 2013
#35