Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)

10. Laughable considering what I used to do

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #9)

Fri Apr 19, 2013, 11:22 PM

Apr 2013

Note that unsafe taggants would impact the police and military as well as civilians.
Again, I have no problem once they are demonstrated to be safe and there is a reasonable need. Note that my position is identical to that supported by the Nat. Academy of Science in their report on the subject, and not that of the NRA.

How about answering the question about you being allowed to own firearms?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bombing Investigation Severely Hampered by NRA! Demand Congress ACT! [View all] FourScore Apr 2013 OP

NRA Turbineguy Apr 2013 #1

That is mostly hyperbole from MSNBC/Kos ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #2

Who cares how easy it is to make black powder? Most outgrew wanting to blowup or shoot stuff Hoyt Apr 2013 #3

The efficacy of taggants is very limited. ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #4

5% efficacy is better than none. As usual, you sound more like a gun cultist than a "professor" or a Hoyt Apr 2013 #5

Again, you ignore the basics and underlying tech ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #6

But it is useful, unless you have something to hide. Hoyt Apr 2013 #7

What part of shown to be unsafe in Gov studies did you not understand? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #8

You guys will never accept anything that might tie a gun used in a crime to you. Hoyt Apr 2013 #9

Laughable considering what I used to do ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #10

FBI disagrees. If they were dangerous, safer taggants could be developed except for Hoyt Apr 2013 #11

Did you look at the Nat Acad of Science report? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #12