Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(54,770 posts)

11. FBI disagrees. If they were dangerous, safer taggants could be developed except for

Sat Apr 20, 2013, 07:29 AM

Apr 2013

gun lobby and gun cultists. Since you are not really a "professor" nor "progressive" regarding guns, I'll trust FBI, ATF, etc., before NRA types.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bombing Investigation Severely Hampered by NRA! Demand Congress ACT! [View all] FourScore Apr 2013 OP

NRA Turbineguy Apr 2013 #1

That is mostly hyperbole from MSNBC/Kos ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #2

The efficacy of taggants is very limited. ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #4

Again, you ignore the basics and underlying tech ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #6

But it is useful, unless you have something to hide. Hoyt Apr 2013 #7

What part of shown to be unsafe in Gov studies did you not understand? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #8

Laughable considering what I used to do ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #10

Did you look at the Nat Acad of Science report? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #12