Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
35. She was singing a different tune on election night 2000
Tue Apr 30, 2013, 02:45 PM
Apr 2013
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2000/12/24/the-truth-behind-the-pillars.html

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and her husband, John, a Washington lawyer, have long been comfortable on the cocktail and charity-ball circuit. So at an election-night party on Nov. 7, surrounded for the most part by friends and familiar acquaintances, she let her guard drop for a moment when she heard the first critical returns shortly before 8 p.m. Sitting in her hostess's den, staring at a small black-and-white television set, she visibly started when CBS anchor Dan Rather called Florida for Al Gore. "This is terrible," she exclaimed. She explained to another partygoer that Gore's reported victory in Florida meant that the election was "over," since Gore had already carried two other swing states, Michigan and Illinois.

Moments later, with an air of obvious disgust, she rose to get a plate of food, leaving it to her husband to explain her somewhat uncharacteristic outburst. John O'Connor said his wife was upset because they wanted to retire to Arizona, and a Gore win meant they'd have to wait another four years. O'Connor, the former Republican majority leader of the Arizona State Senate and a 1981 Ronald Reagan appointee, did not want a Democrat to name her successor. Two witnesses described this extraordinary scene to NEWSWEEK. Responding through a spokesman at the high court, O'Connor had no comment.
Thousands of lives and trillions of dollars too late. JaneyVee Apr 2013 #1
She has no conscience... NYtoBush-Drop Dead Apr 2013 #38
he's right, but i don't trust bugliosi any further than i could throw him. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #2
You shouldn't be throwing anyone, with your bad back and all NightWatcher Apr 2013 #3
i don't have a bad back. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #6
Your bad knee! MFrohike Apr 2013 #14
Knee. I can't believe I missed that one NightWatcher Apr 2013 #19
"These five Justices, by their conduct, bvar22 Apr 2013 #4
Right On Justice Stevens, we loose. bahrbearian Apr 2013 #7
That man, Justice Stevens, is my hero Samantha Apr 2013 #15
I didn't go Over-the-Edge until Bush v Gore. bvar22 Apr 2013 #28
And then the media HID the egg-throwing, furious protests at the inauguration of the tblue37 Apr 2013 #47
I can't remember the technical legal term for that "equal weight" argument Samantha Apr 2013 #52
If not treasonous, would it be appropriate to label it felonious as in the indepat Apr 2013 #44
I always called it treason. aquart Apr 2013 #5
Me too. truebluegreen Apr 2013 #20
Even if W had been a great president tblue Apr 2013 #32
I call it the 2nd xxqqqzme Apr 2013 #36
I would have said the rise of Reagan via the Iran-Contra affair was the first contemporary coup davekriss Apr 2013 #60
They call it "loyalty",...to Party, to Reagan, to God. (Who is a Capitalist) Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2013 #37
O'Connor and the rest of the courtesans should go down as mass murderers with that decision. freshwest Apr 2013 #8
I hope she rots in Hell! emsimon33 Apr 2013 #24
What's most telling to me Canuckistanian Apr 2013 #9
exactly phantom power Apr 2013 #30
a mistake, sandra? really??? niyad Apr 2013 #10
there are no conspiracies, dammit! Whisp Apr 2013 #11
Shame on Sandra sheshe2 Apr 2013 #12
The blood of so many is on their hands... FailureToCommunicate Apr 2013 #13
The 1964 book None Dare Call it Treason,came to mind from the Nation's title lunasun Apr 2013 #16
Now she says this. Marie Marie Apr 2013 #17
Agreed emsimon33 Apr 2013 #25
Bush V. Gore = worst SCOTUS decision ever, worst president ever. Initech Apr 2013 #18
+1 tex-wyo-dem Apr 2013 #22
I don't think it's overdramatic, either deutsey Apr 2013 #34
It's not overdramatic at all. It's what happened, and what was the inevitable result. calimary Apr 2013 #54
I don't believe it was a mistake at all. I believe it was deliberate crime. If SHE made a 'mistake' sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #21
I think she made a mistake if intentionally doing something illegal can be considered a mistake. rhett o rick Apr 2013 #49
I wish I could K&R this 1000 times! emsimon33 Apr 2013 #23
It was a 5-4 Republican vote. Old and In the Way Apr 2013 #26
And olivelove Apr 2013 #27
CORRECT Skittles Apr 2013 #57
Thanks Skittles olivelove Apr 2013 #59
This vote effected the entire world and cost millions of lives. Marrah_G Apr 2013 #29
too late to repair your legacy, sandra noiretextatique Apr 2013 #31
I looked at the Florida mob shot SCVDem Apr 2013 #33
She was singing a different tune on election night 2000 deutsey Apr 2013 #35
At the time, I thought John2 Apr 2013 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author YOHABLO Apr 2013 #46
raygun dothemath Apr 2013 #39
It is no big deal, I never had any respect for the 5 in the first place. Rex Apr 2013 #40
Vincent Bugliosi obviously doesn't understand OnyxCollie Apr 2013 #42
They sold America down the River of Perdition Berlum Apr 2013 #43
DU called it Treason from Day One. Octafish Apr 2013 #45
It is the same as it ever was. We are hated for being right. Rex Apr 2013 #48
''Only the educated are free.'' -- Epictetus Octafish Apr 2013 #50
It was Bush v. Gore sulphurdunn Apr 2013 #51
Scalia and Thomas should have recused The Wizard Apr 2013 #53
Spot on n/t lordsummerisle Apr 2013 #56
we heaven05 Apr 2013 #55
If Justice was real DonCoquixote Apr 2013 #58
I've Thought Long and Hard About This... syberlion May 2013 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»None Dare Call It Treason...»Reply #35