Your quote #1
JA: Politically, itsthe head of the Swedish Supreme Court came out and said that the case is a mess ...
That response was specific to Assange's extradition case not the criminal case. Here is the quote in context. (emphasis mine)
Chris Hedges: So what do you, when you watch all these sort of, you know, all this movement, what do you think theyre trying to do? How do they want to try and get you out of here?
Julian Assange: I think its a mess. I dont think that they havetheres so many different parties with different interests. Its a mess. The U.K. wants it to go away, but doesnt want to lose prestige in relation to Ecuador. The situation in Sweden is getting so bad now that
Sweden will never offend the U.S. Neither countryneither the U.K. or Sweden will ever offend the U.S. But within that, the situation is so bad now in Sweden
Your quote #2... I am not sure what you are claiming here. Of course the Susman said that the U.S. is waiting until after the Swedish case, a fact that both Assange and his assistant repeated. (For some reason, you messed with the sequence and put two sentences together that were separated by other comments in the interview).
In context:
JA: They dont need to.
We have some indications. The [then-U.S.] ambassador for the U.K., Louis Susman, said in the beginning of 2011 that they were waiting until after the Swedish case. The Independent [newspaper]
CH: Waiting for what?
JA: Whats the U.S. interest in this situation? Its up for my extradition. He didnt say that, but its the obvious context.
Assanges assistant: So the U.S. ambassador to the U.K. said early
JA: 2011.
Assanges assistant:
early 2011 that the U.S. was waiting to see what happened with the Swedish case.
Assanges attorney Michael Ratner: They wouldnt file at the same time, because then thered be two competing extraditionsand so they would wait until
CH: Oh, I see. OK, I got it.
JA: If not, thered be one in the queue, and then the other one would come in, and then it would be the plight of the home secretary to make a decision, a reviewable court decision, a politically reviewable decision, to swap the precedent for these.
MR: So what they would do, is if they were going to actually, if Julian had won a non-extradition, they would likely at that point in the U.K. court file their extradition.