Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If the US wants Julian Assange, why not extradite him directly from the UK? [View all]jazzimov
(1,456 posts)39. There is one problem with all of the "extradition"
conspiracy theories -
The US hasn't charged him.
He keeps yelling that the reason he won't come out from Embassy protection is that he doesn't want to be extradited to the US.
Except that the US hasn't charged him with anything, and so has no basis to extradite him.
People, please. If you have been following this guy at all - he is a snake-oil salesman. Even his own site WikiLeaks has abandoned him. He's an opportunist. he's a jerk. He hurts the cause of Transparency much more than he helps it.
I support sincere transparency. I hate Assange. He hurts our cause. He is an idiot, and makes the rest of us look like idiots.
Fuck Julian Assange.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If the US wants Julian Assange, why not extradite him directly from the UK? [View all]
Nye Bevan
May 2013
OP
Assange has not been in UK custody. That's thje same as US>--He's in Ecuador embassy
librechik
May 2013
#2
He was arrested in the UK in 2010, but did not hole up in the Ecuadorian embassy until June 2012.
Nye Bevan
May 2013
#4
"Mr Assange was arrested by appointment at a London police station at 0930 GMT. "
Nye Bevan
May 2013
#20
He was in UK custody for 2 years before he bolted to the Ecuadoran embassy...nt
SidDithers
May 2013
#5
According to this link, the US does *not* need to supply prima facie evidence
Nye Bevan
May 2013
#10
You need to read clauses in context: the UK requires a warrant or conviction to extradite.
leveymg
May 2013
#37
UK has charges on him now--he violated his bail and disregarded the directives of the court.
MADem
May 2013
#46
They've got "custody." They just don't have to make him dinner or call the doctor if he's sick.
MADem
May 2013
#49
So, what? The Austrialian and UK press reports that there will be. The U.S. press reports that
Luminous Animal
May 2013
#25
Sorry. I can't trust the latest U.S. government anonymous sources to deliver the truth.
Luminous Animal
May 2013
#29
Until an indictment is unsealed, there are no grounds to extradite him to the U.S.
leveymg
May 2013
#34
"... Sweden (as the UK) is party to the European Convention of Human Rights. The convention has been
struggle4progress
May 2013
#41