Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,273 posts)
43. Report on CIA rendition reveals massive scale of European assistance
Tue May 21, 2013, 05:26 AM
May 2013

Open Society research assembles long roster of nations willing to help the Bush administration with extra-legal program
Tom McCarthy
Tuesday 5 February 2013 14.24 EST

... Of pre-2004 European Union states, only three – France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands – apparently sat out the CIA's global kidnap-and-torture program ... A new report by the Open Society Justice Initiative names 54 foreign governments that participated in the CIA program ... The report also assembles the most comprehensive list to date of terror suspects caught up in the CIA program and tracks the fate of each suspect ... The report lists 136 suspects in all ... Italy has convicted officials on criminal charges for their involvement. Canada apologized to Canadian citizen Maher Arar, who was picked up at JFK airport in New York City and flown to Syria, where he was "imprisoned for more than ten months in a tiny grave-like cell, beaten with cables, and threatened with electric shocks" ... Canada, Sweden, Australia and the United Kingdom have issued compensation to extraordinary rendition victims ... The Danish government has reported "more than 100 flights credibly alleged to be involved in extraordinary renditions had passed through Danish airspace ... A 2007 European Parliament report "express<ed> serious concern about the 147 stopovers made by CIA-operated aircraft at Irish airports ... Finnish records show 150 landings in Finland by aircraft associated with the CIA program ...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/05/cia-rendition-help-european-leaders



The Open Society Initiatives report lists the two known cases (Ahmed Agiza and Muhammed al-Zery ) in Sweden, rendered in December 2001. These cases provoked public outcry in Sweden. According to the report

... in 2008, the Swedish chancellor of justice awarded Agiza and al-Zery approximately three million Swedish kronor (approximately $500,000) each as compensation for Sweden’s involvement in their rendition and torture. In July 2012, Ahmed Agiza was granted permanent residence in Sweden ...


The UK has been less forthcoming regarding its apparently longer term and more substantial involvement. The report indicates there is evidence implicating the UK in the renditions of a number of people, including Bisher al-Rawi and Jamil el-Banna (2002), Binyam Mohamed (2002), Omar Deghayes (2002), Sami al-Saadi (2004), Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq and his wife Fatima Bouchar (2004), and in several of these cases the UK also seems to have been involved in the torture. According to the report:

In November 2010, the U.K. government entered into a confidential settlement with Bisher al-Rawi, Jamil el-Banna, Richard Belmar, Omar Deghayes, Binyam Mohamed, and Martin Mubanga ... In June 2009, after MI6 itself referred one of its officers to the attorney general, the police commenced Operation Iden, an investigation into the actions of MI6 officers who interrogated suspects at the U.S.-run prison at Bagram, Afghanistan, in January 2002 ... In December 2012, the British government paid al-Saadi £2.23m to settle his lawsuit without admitting liability
Nothing? Anyone? (nt) Nye Bevan May 2013 #1
Assange has not been in UK custody. That's thje same as US>--He's in Ecuador embassy librechik May 2013 #2
He was arrested in the UK in 2010, but did not hole up in the Ecuadorian embassy until June 2012. Nye Bevan May 2013 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Nye Bevan May 2013 #6
he was not charged.. he was detained. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #16
"Mr Assange was arrested by appointment at a London police station at 0930 GMT. " Nye Bevan May 2013 #20
'A person who has not been charged can be arrested.' Phillip McCleod May 2013 #21
there ya go.. i corrected the typo/brain fart.. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #24
Because they don't want him. That's why. MADem May 2013 #32
He was in UK custody for 2 years before he bolted to the Ecuadoran embassy...nt SidDithers May 2013 #5
no he was under house arrest to keep him from fleeing.. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #15
You need to read to facts of the case... SidDithers May 2013 #23
why would the UK do that? they're not *charging* him with *anything* Phillip McCleod May 2013 #26
The UK isn't going to charge him with anything... SidDithers May 2013 #30
the u.s. hasn't asked for extradition.. yet. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #35
Assange isn't in limbo... SidDithers May 2013 #36
No: he may face prison and fines for jumping bail struggle4progress May 2013 #40
Don't try to understand with your mind grasshopper. ucrdem May 2013 #3
Julian? Is that you? randome May 2013 #9
Yes. No. ucrdem May 2013 #14
i'm flattered. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #17
Some grasshoppers are more equal than others! randome May 2013 #28
well that's kinda weird.. but ok.. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #31
Yeah, not really sure what I was aiming for, there. randome May 2013 #45
Rights. Xithras May 2013 #7
According to this link, the US does *not* need to supply prima facie evidence Nye Bevan May 2013 #10
You need to read clauses in context: the UK requires a warrant or conviction to extradite. leveymg May 2013 #37
exactly the obvious point. the UK won't play bad cop. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #19
sure.. 2 reasons.. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #8
He would not be extradited to the US for the rape charges. Nye Bevan May 2013 #11
just figured that one out? incisive. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #13
UK has charges on him now--he violated his bail and disregarded the directives of the court. MADem May 2013 #46
haha.. yeh *now* they have charges.. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #47
They've got "custody." They just don't have to make him dinner or call the doctor if he's sick. MADem May 2013 #49
that fits my earlier point to a tee. Phillip McCleod May 2013 #50
They wouldn't have charges on him if he answered the charges in Sweden. MADem May 2013 #51
I don't think so. That is the one argument that makes the whole US vs. Julian treestar May 2013 #12
The UK Independent reports in December of 2010 Luminous Animal May 2013 #18
Reuters via HuffPo, Aug. 22, 2012: This Parrot is Dead ucrdem May 2013 #22
So, what? The Austrialian and UK press reports that there will be. The U.S. press reports that Luminous Animal May 2013 #25
Your Indepenent link is from 2010. ucrdem May 2013 #27
Sorry. I can't trust the latest U.S. government anonymous sources to deliver the truth. Luminous Animal May 2013 #29
It names 2 US sources, but the point is it's politically a dead letter. n/t ucrdem May 2013 #33
Until an indictment is unsealed, there are no grounds to extradite him to the U.S. leveymg May 2013 #34
I recall a wrinkle in UK law LittleBlue May 2013 #38
"... Sweden (as the UK) is party to the European Convention of Human Rights. The convention has been struggle4progress May 2013 #41
Sweden Violated Torture Ban in CIA Rendition LittleBlue May 2013 #42
Report on CIA rendition reveals massive scale of European assistance struggle4progress May 2013 #43
There is one problem with all of the "extradition" jazzimov May 2013 #39
The US isn't claiming Assange violated US law Recursion May 2013 #44
Here are the players in the vast left-wing conspiracy to 'get' Assange. randome May 2013 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the US wants Julian As...»Reply #43