Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,220 posts)
55. Welcome to DU, Pragdem! I'm very appreciative of all the comments, both pro and con.
Tue May 21, 2013, 02:34 PM
May 2013

Glad you're here! And thanks for weighing in. I WANTED comments because I wanted to know what people here thought.

Perhaps it's not a reasonable solution. But the problem I have is - we've TRIED all the reasonable solutions.

Compromise? Yeah, look how well THAT one has worked.

Stern words? Nothing happens. Maybe not stern enough? And those on our side, if they even utter stern words, do NOTHING to back it all up.

Meeting them halfway? Yeah, look how well THAT one's worked. john boner once said openly that he got 98 percent of what he wanted. And Obama got two percent? How is THAT a reasonable solution? Especially since even 98% wasn't enough for boner and his crowd.

Extreme? Well, in the last regime, they threw all kinds of crap at us, called us unAmerican, people lost their jobs for speaking out, people were ostracised and shunned and ignored for speaking out. NO ONE on the other side was given much credence, attention, face-time, voice time on the radio, the press was against us, and even our own reps were against us and wouldn't listen. Precious few stood up and spoke out and tried to stop it. And too many of our reps just fell in line like good little puppy dogs and didn't object or resist or try to make a stink or try to force their way onto shows like "Meet the Press" where it was wall-to-wall bush/cheney supporters with the drumbeat for war given a FULL pass and 100% of the attention and coverage.

Make them pay a political price? How? By getting them voted out? How's that working in the red states - especially those that are FIRMLY and resolutely still red? How does that work against jerrymandering and politicking and the mass media and talk radio and Pox Noise machinery that somehow ensures that people in those red states keep voting for the GOP even when it is SOUNDLY against their own best interests? When, by now, most of them have been brainwashed by resolute and repetitive propagandizing so they won't listen to reason now, in any case. WHAT political price? That doesn't seem like a very realistic option at the moment, at all. Look, when you have a candidate as bad and as damaged as a mark sanford, who's a PROVEN sleeze and a cheat and a liar and a deserter (not just of his wife and sons but his whole frickin' STATE to run off to Argentina to see his backstage girl), and a deadbeat dad - and he STILL gets elected over a very capable Dem - mainly because the constituents in that district are SO DEEPLY inculcated with the GOP belief system that they cannot see beyond it, no matter what - what can be done? When you give them facts and they still reject. When you warn them and they still don't listen. What's to be done? What will make them stop?????

Perhaps the "T-word" isn't the answer. Perhaps sedition isn't the answer. So what IS? I just think we consider playing real hardball and putting THEM on the defensive for a change. Making them stop and think for a moment before they go further? Assuming, of course, that it's even possible to do that. I mean, what keeps assholes like darrell issa at it, term after term after term? We don't seem able to get him voted out, here in California. He keeps heading back to Washington time after time, and what was everybody saying about him when the GOP took over the House? The speculation was on high about how soon he'd start investigating Obama's bellybutton lint as the CONS did with Bill Clinton. And sure enough, that's what he's doing now.

What's to be done? I'm looking for other options because I think we need to think outside the box, and do something uncharacteristic for Dems - and fight back with TEETH. NOT the Harry Reid way, trusting the GOP to be reasonable on a handshake. It just seems as though the options we have, the tools we have, and all the approaches we've been trying, haven't worked. I think we need a political 2x4 to smack them across the faces and make them stop. Or at least stop and think for a moment. I don't see anything else working. And you know what Einstein said about continuing to do the same stuff that gets you the same bad results, but you keep doing it just hoping you'll get some different results for a change. Einstein defined that as insanity.

And at least to me, this situation is untenable, and unsustainable. I think we need our own "shock & awe." We've taken the high road for years with this opposition, which has only gotten stronger and more forceful and better-financed, and metastasized like a cancer, and nothing helps. And we the people are not served. And the people's business and interests and needs are not being addressed. All because of politics. I just think the status quo is unsustainable. It simply can't go on like this. I think we have to figure out another approach. We can't just let things go on as they are. This shit has to stop. The persecution of Obama has to stop. Or else, it's just going to continue and get worse - simply for the joy of persecuting Obama and keeping him hobbled so he can't get the people's business done. I'll bet we're stuck with mitch mcconnell again next year, for another six years. How's THAT for reinforcing bad behavior?

I also know that the REAL solutions will be 30 to 40 years in the making, as our side finally wakes up to the realization that we have to fight the way the bad guys have - with this well-orchestrated and funded campaign that started back in the early 70s with the Powell Doctrine and others - to put corporate America firmly in charge of this country and everyone in it, via think tanks and foundations and groomings of new operatives and candidates and future "journalists" to the corporate way of thinking. It was in reaction to all the social justice that the 60's brought to America. There was a Bill Moyers post about it here on DU a few days back, and here's what it was talking about:

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/news-and-blogs/campaign-blog/the-lewis-powell-memo-corporate-blueprint-to-/blog/36466/

And if we resolutely go about that (assuming our Dems and progressive groups even have the wherewithal attempt this), then maybe in 30 or 40 years we'll dominate the national mindset again. Which would be great. But it does NOTHING to address what's happening at this moment.

I appreciate everybody for weighing in, even those who've dumped on me and insulted me. Because I think we need to start talking about this OPENLY. Maybe even the sheer fact of bringing it up might open a way to bring some sense to at least a FEW on the other side, to stop this madness. Or at least slow it down.





Damned right it should be circulated. DemocratsForProgress May 2013 #1
I'm just fed up. You bad-guys wanna start insinuating about the "I-word"? calimary May 2013 #4
Congressional Democrats and Democratic strategists should be pushing this truth BlueCaliDem May 2013 #33
Yeah. Summer Hathaway May 2013 #2
Bill Clinton said it best RobertEarl May 2013 #3
It's disturbing how closely your argument mirrors the neo-cons of the previous administration. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #5
Ah, the old false-equivalency thing again. Not relevant here. Not by a long shot. calimary May 2013 #6
Obstructionism is not treason. It just isn't. So by calling them treasonous... Gravitycollapse May 2013 #8
good luck with that... mikeysnot May 2013 #29
It is during wartime. You know, that period where the Constitution really doesn't count by design? nebenaube May 2013 #57
That is exactly what the neo-cons said! Gravitycollapse May 2013 #61
That is my thought. It can be argued that the Republicans are giving aid and comfort to the JDPriestly May 2013 #13
Spot on! MNBrewer May 2013 #25
It's disturbing how you're on a Democratic Party supporting site and appear against the OP's BlueCaliDem May 2013 #34
Treason is defined in law in the Constitution, Article III. longship May 2013 #7
Great post oberliner May 2013 #14
Yes, the extremist 20 have committed treason. Sedition is illegal graham4anything May 2013 #9
as is libel... SQUEE May 2013 #23
Why did you pick me to reply to?Especially as 40 other replies said the same thing. graham4anything May 2013 #26
in the flow of this thread, yours is the first to outright say it, so I replied... SQUEE May 2013 #28
sedition. pansypoo53219 May 2013 #10
Google "alien and sedition act" longship May 2013 #12
Nope dreamnightwind May 2013 #11
Good luck with all that RandiFan1290 May 2013 #15
Your argument is, well, sickening. cali May 2013 #16
Yes, of course we should. graham4anything May 2013 #27
of course we should sit down and shut up for any war time President? SICK cali May 2013 #36
So G4A, we're you a big Nixon supporter? onenote May 2013 #42
Their behavior is definitely anti-American and unpatriotic. I get that people have differing views spicegal May 2013 #17
No, not in a legal sense sakabatou May 2013 #18
I think the obstructing R's in congress and in fact at all levels of government have been geckosfeet May 2013 #19
H.L. Mencken and Eugene V. Debs might want you to rethink your stance.. SQUEE May 2013 #20
Which of our political enemies do you want to see executed first? el_bryanto May 2013 #21
........................ Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #22
1. We don't recognize "High Treason" in the US MNBrewer May 2013 #24
But it was enough to silence the opposition, wasn't it? eom BlueCaliDem May 2013 #35
While I didn't stop my criticism MNBrewer May 2013 #39
"Seems like an idiotic means to an end." BlueCaliDem May 2013 #43
Don't get me wrong MNBrewer May 2013 #47
I think you need to read the Constitution. nt hack89 May 2013 #30
It's what they would be screaming if this were a Republican administration... Pragdem May 2013 #31
It should be punished politically onenote May 2013 #41
Welcome to DU, Pragdem! I'm very appreciative of all the comments, both pro and con. calimary May 2013 #55
This is a bad idea that can't even survive its own standard for a mere 55 posts. Nuclear Unicorn May 2013 #60
Treason has a very specific definition. MineralMan May 2013 #32
I hate it when DUers openly display their ignorance of the Constitution onenote May 2013 #37
In my short time on this forum, I've noticed quite a bit of that. Nimajneb Nilknarf May 2013 #51
To paraphrase William Pitt: Derp Jeff In Milwaukee May 2013 #58
The stragest aspect to me is that people don't understand one of our basic principles of law Nimajneb Nilknarf May 2013 #62
Oooooh. TREASON, probably HIGH TREASON? Nye Bevan May 2013 #38
That was awesome Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #40
If it could be shown that certain GOP officials ucrdem May 2013 #46
+1 MNBrewer May 2013 #48
We're Seeing History Repeat Itself ChoppinBroccoli May 2013 #44
I can't get over how absolutely terrible and idiotic this op is and I can't believe cali May 2013 #45
I thought I was the ony one. Dpm12 May 2013 #49
I think you are close to a tour de force of hyperbole. Nimajneb Nilknarf May 2013 #50
no. fishwax May 2013 #52
You are wrong on this one. This is not Treason. SlimJimmy May 2013 #53
No. The T word is carefully defined in the Constitution nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #54
The Bill of Rights applies all the time. BlueCheese May 2013 #56
None of it is treason treestar May 2013 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TREASON. I think the GOP'...»Reply #55