Hang on, let's try that amazing rhetorical technique in reverse, and see how well it works for me. Okay, here we go.
So your okay with letting teenage sociopaths getting away with murder without any consequences at all? Seriously? You believe adults capable of voting, marrying, raising there own children should never have to face the consequences for the crimes they commit, as long as they are still a teenager?
You make my point.
Oh wait. That's not what you actually meant, is it? Silly me.
I just thought, in your original little rant, you were feeling self-righteous and spouting off out of ignorance. However, perhaps I am in error, or maybe I didn't make my opinion clear. Let me try a translation for you.
The sentence, "I would bet money that if the OP worked for just five days as a substitute teacher at any middle school in the country that he would come to realize that, in some cases, abortion should be legal well within the 60th trimester" loosely translates to mean that you are ignorant of the motivations and viciousness of some children which renders you incapable of accurate general observations about how courts should deal with children, and that, until you gain that insight, your opinion is as worthless as your skill identifying hyperbole.