Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SleeplessinSoCal

(9,107 posts)
15. Why not use the term "Neoliberalism" again?
Fri May 31, 2013, 01:02 AM
May 2013

For one very good reason - because "liberal" is so disparaged by the right. Many have no clue about what it means. Maybe it should be resurrected for the purpose of educating and properly putting the blame on it, where it belongs.

"Neoliberalism is a political philosophy whose advocates support economic liberalization, free trade and open markets, privatization, deregulation, and decreasing the size of the public sector while increasing the role of the private sector in modern society.

The term was introduced in the late 1930s by European liberal scholars to promote a new form of liberalism after interest in classical liberalism had declined in Europe. In the decades that followed, neoliberal theory tended to be at variance with the more laissez-faire doctrine of classical liberalism and promoted instead a market economy under the guidance and rules of a strong state, a model which came to be known as the social market economy. In the sixties, usage of the term "neoliberal" heavily declined. When the term was reintroduced in the following decades, the meaning had shifted. The term neoliberal is now normally associated with laissez-faire economic policies, and is used mainly by those who are critical of legislative market reform."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

thanks Hissyspit Cha May 2013 #1
Oh..I think DUer's are constantly angry at the GOP. They give us fresh "Pissed-off" ammunition.. BlueJazz May 2013 #2
Will cutting off of noses to spite their faces never end? JEB May 2013 #3
Not when they think the only noses getting cut belong to "those people"... JHB May 2013 #25
They are not cutting their noses, they are the 1%. lark May 2013 #49
Not only greedy but stupid as well. JEB May 2013 #60
They Only Tolerate Programs That Benefit Them grilled onions May 2013 #4
Unfortunately, that is exactly what I think kairos12 May 2013 #39
Great synopsis.The only thing that gives them the feeling that they are alive is cruelty & control. hue May 2013 #54
Too Late, I've Been Angry Since the Reagan Administration mckara May 2013 #5
+1,000,000 brazillion! nt Mnemosyne May 2013 #10
exactly Doctor_J May 2013 #12
we were outraged before krugman was. HiPointDem May 2013 #26
If people are enraged how come we don't have... Hotler May 2013 #47
Because they saw the futility of the war protests and OWS Doctor_J May 2013 #48
That won't work either lark May 2013 #50
Me too, mckara! I'm so fed up with republi-CONS I could just spit up. calimary May 2013 #14
^^This!^^ BrotherIvan May 2013 #20
THANK YOU Skittles May 2013 #51
+ 1000 pangaia May 2013 #56
WWJS Beowulf May 2013 #6
Why the poor of course (Republican Jesus, the other one would feed not starve people) Dragonfli May 2013 #9
Please expand this into a full post BrotherIvan May 2013 #21
Here have at it, Dragonfli May 2013 #24
Cool, thanks BrotherIvan May 2013 #31
Ha! JustAnotherGen May 2013 #27
A portrait of Berlin Expat May 2013 #42
Welcome to DU, Beowulf! Exactly! calimary May 2013 #17
Thanks, calimary, but actually Beowulf May 2013 #18
Mission Accomplished I'M ANGRY! Dragonfli May 2013 #7
I AM ElsewheresDaughter May 2013 #8
K&R MotherPetrie May 2013 #11
Krugman is a voice of sanity.. Permanut May 2013 #13
Why not use the term "Neoliberalism" again? SleeplessinSoCal May 2013 #15
giant kick for Paul Krugman. BlancheSplanchnik May 2013 #16
we probably should revolt or something. nt limpyhobbler May 2013 #19
until we click on the next thread Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #29
K & R AzDar May 2013 #22
k&r n/t RainDog May 2013 #23
Moody's on economic stimulus ... Scuba May 2013 #28
Just thinking about ellie May 2013 #30
Statistics on Hunger in America (states down in link). DhhD May 2013 #34
k&r for Paul Krugman. Interesting comments follow article. n/t Laelth May 2013 #32
Yep-- people sometimes say they wonder when the wealthy will stop demanding more. Marr May 2013 #33
The basic Republican sulphurdunn May 2013 #35
WalMart rickyhall May 2013 #36
K & R !!! WillyT May 2013 #37
Worthless eaters. blkmusclmachine May 2013 #38
The flip side of Food Stamps pitchforx May 2013 #40
There are no words. redqueen May 2013 #41
K & R from one of the perpetually enraged Lifelong Protester May 2013 #43
K&R. Best article Krugman has ever written. JDPriestly May 2013 #44
Americans are too lazy to get angry. n/t Hotler May 2013 #45
Getting angry won't help, they don't give a shit. Rex May 2013 #46
If Republicans get rid of food stamps, how will Wal-Mart workers eat? tclambert May 2013 #52
10/5/1986 was the day to get angry. Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #53
Indeed they could care less how we feel. Yet they do fear our POTUS. K&R!! hue May 2013 #55
Oh, I'm angry, alright... ReRe May 2013 #57
it doesn't become lae unless the president signs it Niceguy1 May 2013 #58
kick Liberal_in_LA May 2013 #59
Krugman FTW. blackspade May 2013 #61
Did anyone else notice the exceptional quality of most of the comments? prole_for_peace May 2013 #62
You have to cut these 28 Republicans some slack. Fuddnik Jun 2013 #63
Not me rickyhall Jun 2013 #64
That's the 28 listed above. Fuddnik Jun 2013 #65
Krugman singles out Republicans. gulliver Jun 2013 #67
NO SLACK- they should know better pitchforx Jun 2013 #68
how can comey "believe in the right thing" and also support crooks like Romney? grasswire Jun 2013 #66
no surprise there LittleGirl Jun 2013 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Krugman: GOP Literally Ta...»Reply #15