Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]
 

Celldweller

(186 posts)
9. what about this
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 01:00 PM
Jun 2013

the U.S. Intelligence Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq?

It was a bipartisan report from Congress... if their conclusions were wrong (and they were) who mislead them?

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jun 2013 OP
They made their own "reality". kentuck Jun 2013 #1
Pancakes and Gazelles! Celldweller Jun 2013 #2
"We know where the WMDs are" was a lie, at least Recursion Jun 2013 #3
The intel found that there were no WMDs in Iraq. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #4
Then you remember it wrong. Whisp Jun 2013 #5
what about this Celldweller Jun 2013 #9
bullshit. Whisp Jun 2013 #10
I'm just trying to get to the bottom of this Celldweller Jun 2013 #12
if you think it's all 'bad intel' that led to the war Whisp Jun 2013 #14
You sound like a fan of theirs. sibelian Jun 2013 #6
lol NO Celldweller Jun 2013 #8
no it wasn't. Whisp Jun 2013 #13
Seriously? SammyWinstonJack Jun 2013 #7
Seriously? O.k. I'll play Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #11
I'm sure the OP was "sincere" in his assertion! rdharma Jun 2013 #15
Well, Bush certainly had "bad intelligence"..... Wounded Bear Jun 2013 #16
That is not a serious question. The bushies created the bad intel inetnionally morningfog Jun 2013 #17
They were "fixing the intelligence around the policy" Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #18
if that were true... Celldweller Jun 2013 #21
Ever hear of Office of Special Plans (OSP) and stovepiping Brother Buzz Jun 2013 #19
thanks for the good leads Celldweller Jun 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #9