Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
22. But, but
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:36 PM
Jun 2013

this is Bush's third and fourth term, don'tcha know??



People who have had axes to grind since the primaries must be down to shivs.

Meanwhile, you're correct. Congress voted for it, get people in Congress who will reverse it.

Maybe letting the Tea Party take over the House in 2010 wasn't the best thing to do...

Anything up to government approved camera monitoring movements 24/7 quinnox Jun 2013 #1
Why, if it's President Of The United States Obama IveWornAHundredPants Jun 2013 #2
... just like the Ark of the Covenant. sibelian Jun 2013 #4
I am not freaked out Andy823 Jun 2013 #3
But, but CakeGrrl Jun 2013 #22
Tea party 2014 would be even worse Andy823 Jun 2013 #27
Actually...it has, that's the problem nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #39
Those that can rationalize will continue..... Bonhomme Richard Jun 2013 #5
It depends on who does it. Bonobo Jun 2013 #6
Facebook freaks me out. Way the hell more than NSA stuff. n/t Whisp Jun 2013 #7
+10 Abukhatar Jun 2013 #16
Any surveillance without a warrant. randome Jun 2013 #8
After they assign a third NSA agent to personal follow me around. ZombieHorde Jun 2013 #9
I would not be surprised if none who support this have the nerve to put metrics Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #10
In home surveillance of my person would be a problem. Motown_Johnny Jun 2013 #11
^This. n/t Chan790 Jun 2013 #26
I never thought about it like that... one_voice Jun 2013 #34
The recent revelations aren't anything new. baldguy Jun 2013 #12
while it's always great to hear that line again, it does not answer the question. Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #15
then what's the beef with snowden? frylock Jun 2013 #23
Maybe China or other totalitarian-style surveillance States Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2013 #13
I don't even consider this to be surveillance alcibiades_mystery Jun 2013 #14
surveillance is different Abukhatar Jun 2013 #17
If your own urine or bloodstream is subject to surveillance then how much more intrusive can it get? Fumesucker Jun 2013 #18
As an Occupier, I have seen the FOIA documents proving the US government spied upon us, Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #19
the surveillance supporters here denied that was happening.. frylock Jun 2013 #24
Lets be clear here Michael James Cobb Jun 2013 #37
Kinect 2.0 sagat Jun 2013 #20
Toilet cam. Warren Stupidity Jun 2013 #21
It's not the monitoring that bothers me eissa Jun 2013 #25
randomly listening to phone calls and reading emails. DCBob Jun 2013 #28
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2013 #29
Man, I was just thinking about this very thing.. SomethingFishy Jun 2013 #30
I highly doubt Diane Feinstein or anyone else thucythucy Jun 2013 #31
Right, she just wants to know what I'm doing outside the bathroom.. SomethingFishy Jun 2013 #32
Get over yourself. thucythucy Jun 2013 #45
Warrantless wiretapping. n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #33
My dad was a military officer about 50 years ago LeftInTX Jun 2013 #35
Watching a 'live' local news/national news reporting, say on protests benld74 Jun 2013 #36
I'm freaked out at the level of public and private corruption that has been going on despite Baitball Blogger Jun 2013 #38
Why don't we (American people) find out FIRST what the level of surveillance rustydog Jun 2013 #40
Ok tell me, when is Frank Church convening hearings? nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #41
Well, I'll tell you what it wasn't. Baitball Blogger Jun 2013 #43
listening to my phone calls without a warrant Recursion Jun 2013 #42
Perhaps It Was Meant to Freak Everyone Out AndyTiedye Jun 2013 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What level of surveillanc...»Reply #22