Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What we have here ... [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)79. Thanks for kicking this thread, I almost missed it and it is a very excellent OP.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
211 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
not at all. not when you have folks on your side who surely have their hair flaming
cali
Jun 2013
#11
My hair used to be calm...because I mistakenly believed we had a government that would
dkf
Jun 2013
#98
What about those of us without any hair? Okay, I guess that's a discussion for
SlimJimmy
Jun 2013
#151
What is this 'metadata' you are speaking of? I was told by the President that my
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#138
It seems more like a 'trust' vs. a 'dis-trust' divide to me. There are those who
HardTimes99
Jun 2013
#124
The lesser of two evils is catching up fast. Cuts to food snaps (Senate Dems voted for it),
forestpath
Jun 2013
#9
Straw men, labeling, other ad hominem tactics, thats the order of the day if you dont completely buy
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#176
I'm also prior service and also took an oath. Why do you feel the need to keep bringing it up?
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#204
You are correct. Once I researched the facts and put them out there both on my show and via
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#152
Thanks for kicking this thread, I almost missed it and it is a very excellent OP.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#79
Those who disagree with you PREFER to live under an authoritarian state
BeyondGeography
Jun 2013
#38
And here we are discussing it freely on technology that was handed down by the military
BeyondGeography
Jun 2013
#63
You're not missing anything, same old same old yawn inducting 'rah rah' I'm so funny and it is it
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#81
Weak attempts, yes. Considering the sources though your credibiity is being hugely enhanced
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#87
It is not what they believe. Just another distraction technique, best to ignore it. Did you see the
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#84
Consider the sources. I never get upset by anything said by these people, although accusing DUers
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#99
Lol, I went to political bootcamp when Bush was installed in the WH. I used to go to sites
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#103
And those "liberals" who desperately search for any sign of imperfection in the President?
baldguy
Jun 2013
#51
Yeah, but they didn't seem to really care until these allegations were leveled against Obama.
baldguy
Jun 2013
#56
The allegations, what allegations? Leaks is what the President called them. That means they are
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#89
That is NOT what people are upset about. They are upset, try to read this carefully, about
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#97
their abuse is not entertaining, but it is a testimony to your irrefutability
carolinayellowdog
Jun 2013
#119
Then those things should stand up to an examination of the facts, right? nt
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#177
lol Well true, there is that! The OP and another person seem to lovingly stroke their ignore lists
Number23
Jun 2013
#185
They will post 100 saying Obama is dog...that's good enough for the bashers
uponit7771
Jun 2013
#108
stick to the issues and avoid characterizing the motives of folks who bother to respond to you
bigtree
Jun 2013
#147
On this issue, they can't and they seem to know that the facts don't support them.
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#170
Asking you questions is NOT BAITING YOU. Why start the damn OP if you're just going
Number23
Jun 2013
#184
The attacks started by those who attacked anyone who didnt think the sky was falling from the
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#155
Doesnt work Nadin. There are lots of articles like this one in 2006 in USA Today
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#165
The ACLU? I quote them. I know, you can't handle the facts here. Like all the rest on your side.
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#168
I know the history already, it's in the transcript from my show. The facts are against you.
stevenleser
Jun 2013
#171