General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FISA & EPCA the facts & nothing more [View all]Monkie
(1,301 posts)as i thought all along.
i did put up, i pointed out the flaws in your argument,
your assertion with regards to the "180 days email" was wrong and you did not have the grace to retract that.
you offer nothing to counter my objection to your assertion of "a warrant is only good for a year"
and you offer nothing to counter my claim that one can drive a bus through the ambiguous wording of the act, and that there is also no way we can check if this is exactly what government lawyers are doing, in secret.
i was gracious enough to concede that you might have a point that oversight by the judges themselves is better than portrayed by greenwald, but still in no way what any normal human being would call open justice or proper oversight.
i would say that is, game, set, and match, as they say in tennis.
you said you welcomed a discussion, let me remind you then, a discussion does not mean bowing down to your assertions without question, i questioned your assertions in 3 key areas, and you folded, end of story.