Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

grantcart

(53,061 posts)

8. Your reply is completely off the discussion of the action of the leakers as was

Reply to Bonobo (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 01:59 AM

Jun 2013

explained in order to try and point out that we shouldn't get sidetracked into discussions about the legality of publishing secret material.

However you seem to have a problem following the OP and when you link "tattling" "loyalty oaths" as somehow being in the same neighborhood as leaking secret material it doesn't provide much common ground to discuss, if it were the subject of the OP, which it isn't.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Let us make a distinction between "leakers" (Snowden/Manning) and "publishers" (Assange/Greenwald) [View all] grantcart Jun 2013 OP

Totally agree. Narkos Jun 2013 #1

"Betraying an oath" Bonobo Jun 2013 #2

Your reply is completely off the discussion of the action of the leakers as was grantcart Jun 2013 #8

Couldn't agree more. Somehow, I hope this points out how deeply divided the country really is, and leveymg Jun 2013 #3

I pretty much agree with that, however, I want to know what Mister Greenwald knew, and when he knew MADem Jun 2013 #4

But again that is somewhat confusing grantcart Jun 2013 #9

I don't think being a lawyer has an on/off switch. MADem Jun 2013 #10

Who cares? It's still a surveillance police state. PSPS Jun 2013 #5

Well, Greenwald misrepresented the truth in his article. He didn't fact check or give proper KittyWampus Jun 2013 #6

Criticizing his writing is valid but others seem like they want to find something criminal in his grantcart Jun 2013 #7

So you would be okay with it if... moondust Jun 2013 #11

Well, If Churchhill had been raping Iraqis and covering up prisoner abuse... sibelian Jun 2013 #13

WHAT? Nooooo!!!! Let's conflate them meaninglessly and have emotional disturbance insteaaaaad... sibelian Jun 2013 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Jun 2013 #14

What secrets did Greenwald publish? randome Jun 2013 #15