Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

treestar

(82,383 posts)
10. Why are we required to agree on that?
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:24 AM
Jun 2013

We know little about it. The metadata on phone calls is all that we know of that is new; before that we didn't have anyone complaining that it was that vast and right now we don't have any facts about how many people are involved in it. Of course the program was secret, that was the whole basis of the outrage. We only know of it because of someone who broke the law. No one was even worried about it before: what if the government has access to a phone company's records?

There was never any worry about the NSA and what it might do during the Bush Administration.

How many people do you think are involved? (nt) Recursion Jun 2013 #1
I saw 850,000 "analysts", many privatized, wading through the data in the UK press. bemildred Jun 2013 #2
What "data"? All of it? I call BS on that. Recursion Jun 2013 #3
Here: bemildred Jun 2013 #4
UK has never had a 4th amendment or anything like it Recursion Jun 2013 #5
Yes, it is different, and I don't claim to know much about that, but bemildred Jun 2013 #7
You call BS? Maybe the figure is wrong. Maybe it's only 849,000 people. You dont know. PERIOD!! rhett o rick Jun 2013 #8
And since most of it is now handled by Private Security Corporations, we have no idea how much sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #9
Well yeah, there are some other issues like that too. bemildred Jun 2013 #11
I can I agree I don't like the implementation of the program, it's a waste IMHO. That's it... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #6
Good gwad marions ghost Jun 2013 #12
link and quote please uponit7771 Jun 2013 #13
Been enough of those to sink the marions ghost Jun 2013 #15
I don't live on DU, do you have a link and quote of this ? regards uponit7771 Jun 2013 #18
You may need to do some research marions ghost Jun 2013 #20
Why are we required to agree on that? treestar Jun 2013 #10
This I would agree with. Chan790 Jun 2013 #14
Yeah we just need more Bots marions ghost Jun 2013 #16
I'm not talking about his conscience or bots. Chan790 Jun 2013 #17
So do some personality tests marions ghost Jun 2013 #19
You scare me. Chan790 Jun 2013 #21
If you think the problem here is better "vetting"-- marions ghost Jun 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Both supporters and oppon...»Reply #10