Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(19,429 posts)

18. So when the activity was ruled unconstitutional, it was stopped.

Thu Jun 27, 2013, 05:40 PM

Jun 2013

It wasn't unconsititutional prior to the ruling.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Neither are terribly important Recursion Jun 2013 #1

Nobody knows, and thus this poll is pointless. tridim Jun 2013 #2

+1. n/t Orsino Jun 2013 #6

+2 Skidmore Jun 2013 #13

Your comment has nothing to do with the topic at hand. n/t Tx4obama Jun 2013 #7

I like polls. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #5

"It's an obvious question" OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #9

A secret government, or a government of secrets, isn't democrocy. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #10

Has Snowden revealed any criminal activities? Not that I've seen. FarCenter Jun 2013 #11

Yes the extent of NSA surveillance is both unconstitutional and illegal. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #14

So when the activity was ruled unconstitutional, it was stopped. FarCenter Jun 2013 #18

I hear that rubber stamps last a long time. L0oniX Jun 2013 #20

Its easy to prove the crime Snowden committed railsback Jun 2013 #12

The FISA court thinks differently Hydra Jun 2013 #17

thanks for bringing that info to the thread. yurbud Jun 2013 #19

You're very welcome! :) Hydra Jun 2013 #21