Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rand Paul: "Humans Will Marry Non Humans Without DOMA" [View all]eridani
(51,907 posts)167. I get it now. Whether or not I think our national security state is a good idea--
--really ought to depend only on whether or not Snowden is a nice guy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
203 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, it held them hide the fact that they don't have an actual argument against gay marriage
Fortinbras Armstrong
Jun 2013
#189
The bride/groom might have a problem with the "I do" part unless it's a parrot.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#6
The mind boggles at the thought of wedding gifts. Scratching post? Doggie bowl?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#7
In fairness, an 18-year-old cat would be pretty damn old. Eligible for Kitty Social Security.
nomorenomore08
Jun 2013
#199
fine, troglodytes are marrying human females and producing republicans
Nanjing to Seoul
Jun 2013
#143
Given that he's a RW libertarian douchebag, I wouldn't be surprised if Snowden was anti-gay.
baldguy
Jun 2013
#34
Love the fact that you have no clue about Snowdens objectives, but still support him anyway.
baldguy
Jun 2013
#41
"... substantial risk to his own life..." So, Obama is activly trying to get him assasinated?
baldguy
Jun 2013
#79
"...someones intent of doing an action is different than their facial features or looks"
wtmusic
Jun 2013
#188
I get it now. Whether or not I think our national security state is a good idea--
eridani
Jun 2013
#167
Too late! Sister Sarah has already married and replicated several drone clones.
Major Hogwash
Jun 2013
#33
Does this mean we can legally start combining various animal DNA with human DNA,
kentauros
Jun 2013
#51
You know what the leading cause of poverty is in this country, elitist selfish bastards like Rand
Johonny
Jun 2013
#53
Great!,now I just need to find a Vulcan,or an Elf to marry and I'll be happy.
athenasatanjesus
Jun 2013
#57
If this is all that prickwit has as argument against Teh Gay, I ain't worried.
Kurovski
Jun 2013
#72
but according to you and your dad's ideology, they should be free to do whatever they want
SemperEadem
Jun 2013
#76
As a Pennsylvanian, I'm proud he's taking up Sen. Man-on-Dog Santorum's cause.
Demoiselle
Jun 2013
#78
rand paul may call himself a libertarian, but he is not. He is just another repuke bigot
still_one
Jun 2013
#83
Yeah, because law is the only thing that's been stopping humans from marrying nonhumans.
winter is coming
Jun 2013
#100
This just goes to show that Rand Paul is a fraud. He claims to be a libertarian.
totodeinhere
Jun 2013
#107
They already see half the human race in that group, so I'd say they misunderstood a lot.
freshwest
Jun 2013
#193
Marriage with a Non-Human has already happened many times in the past. Look at the Romneys.
Arugula Latte
Jun 2013
#133
Paulbots piss me off. Especially DU Paulbots. They support shit like this
Nanjing to Seoul
Jun 2013
#142
Go to any Paul discussion. I am in no mood to go through DU thread by thread
Nanjing to Seoul
Jun 2013
#147
No, you threw the accusation. Name names. I'm not doing your work for you. n/t
backscatter712
Jun 2013
#148
Again, I have a life and a wife that loves me and wants to spend time with me.
Nanjing to Seoul
Jun 2013
#149
While it is true that general public perception of Paul support does not differentiate issues, so
patrice
Jun 2013
#151
So he represents a state full of jackasses who allow animals to sign contracts?
eridani
Jun 2013
#164