Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pholus

(4,062 posts)
98. "Would you would you in a box...would you would you with a fox."
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 06:27 PM
Feb 2012

Seriously, you're SOOOOO into thinking your moral equivalance card completely and magically excuses Apple that you're pushing this one to absurdist extremes. I just hope for a moment that you actually think about how strange it appears that you insistently push this single TALKING POINT, ignoring all else. In fact, I've continued this discussion long past it being actually interesting because I'm planning on using it as an example in the future.

So for the record, you win: I'm sure if you I gave you permission to loot through my life you'd manage to find something manufactured in China. I can see you now, triumphantly holding up some little shitbang of plastic you found in the bottom of a turned out drawer in my now looted closet and triumphantly exclaiming "See....I proved it! You're a hypocrite! NOW LEAVE POOR APPLE ALOOOOOOONE!!!!"

Enjoy your triumph! It's not like businessmen JUST LIKE STEVE JOBS haven't worked really hard to make sure the alternative is impossible. They saw that "cheap labor" in China and said to themselves "Damn I just gotta tap me some of that...." And not only did they pay LOADS of MONEY to get what they want we also give them tax breaks to do it while their apologists try to tell us it's completely our fault. Where have I seen that line of reasoning recently? Ohhhhhh yeah. The GOP on the safety net. That's a shitty situation that's our fault too. The serial numbers aren't even completely filed off....

So to summarize this for you the presence of some hypothetical piece of crap from China in my closet is NOT, REPEAT NOT, a get out of jail card for APPLE. If poor Apple is all upset thinking they're being singled out perhaps they shouldn't spend millions on advertising to create the impression that they're the "BESTEST COMPANY ON EARTH" cause that kind of raises expectations.

Your prying into my underwear isn't going to change this fundamental fact.

By the way, that particular sweatshop was in Pakistan. Not China.

I looked just now ESPECIALLY for you....

You're welcome and I hope this satisfies you.

Hmm not what I was expecting to read. dkf Feb 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #5
Definitely food for thought. dkf Feb 2012 #8
The related post is the Scheer article which was discussed elsewhere this morning... Pholus Feb 2012 #9
Americans should feel guilty buying anything from China. Zalatix Feb 2012 #84
Leavenworth is better than Alcatraz?? CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #2
and we should believe them because??? mucifer Feb 2012 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #4
Mike Daisey has been to the Foxconn factory FredisDead Feb 2012 #10
Has he been to the garment factories? Javaman Feb 2012 #18
Apples to wrenches? nt Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #6
Man, the whiplash in the required party line is pretty bad... Pholus Feb 2012 #7
Wow, thank you for that fascinating report, everyone should check this out. joshcryer Feb 2012 #55
Kind of reminds me of how gays are treated FreeState Feb 2012 #67
way, way above average of the norm GeorgeGist Feb 2012 #11
Great point "the physical conditions are way, way above average of the norm." grahamhgreen Feb 2012 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #15
As long as the Chinese workers are all happy I guess. Again, I point to Scheer. Pholus Feb 2012 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #19
Yet, some of them would still rather commit suicide than stay or go back. Incitatus Feb 2012 #22
if higher ed had the same suicide rate as foxconn belcffub Feb 2012 #35
Lies, damn lies and statistics. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #45
47 suicides over 36 years.. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #70
There were 300,000 workers at the Foxconn factory in question. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #72
ding ding ding belcffub Feb 2012 #74
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #76
is the 400% internationalized belcffub Feb 2012 #75
How about 'all of the above' has a problem. Zalatix Feb 2012 #85
Apparently quakerboy Feb 2012 #53
The preventative measures were to the library and local bridge.. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #71
That's easy. Make students sign a no-suicide pact with financial penalties for their survivors. Pholus Feb 2012 #82
Fascinating. North Korea also has a similar law, if you kill yourself, your entire family suffers. joshcryer Feb 2012 #88
I guess there is more than one way to look at your data point. Pholus Feb 2012 #24
That's exactly why we need steep tariffs on the Chinese goods, grahamhgreen Feb 2012 #39
Begs the question - how bad is the norm? We need to end the Costly Trade Agreements, increase tariff grahamhgreen Feb 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #34
All the more reason to bring them back! grahamhgreen Feb 2012 #38
Way, way? Is that some professional lingo? Is 'way, way' twice 'way' or 10x 'way'? Bluenorthwest Feb 2012 #14
It's a professional term: Way, way is "way to the way'th power" In other words EXPONENTIALLY. nt Pholus Feb 2012 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #26
Let me repeat my previous post using smaller posts. Pholus Feb 2012 #27
BTW, I'll see your request and ask for a copy of your CV as well. Pholus Feb 2012 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #29
Ah yes, it is the fault of the "Murcan" so the onus is on him. Pholus Feb 2012 #41
Your points are logical, and well reasoned, I do not expect a coherent response. joshcryer Feb 2012 #57
Thanks. You know I tend not to be reasonable myself though, right? ;) Pholus Feb 2012 #61
I'm glad you pointed out the required technical conditions, I probably would've overlooked that. joshcryer Feb 2012 #64
I'm simply amazed how things like this can ever be justified. Or that people even try... Pholus Feb 2012 #87
Your information and rational, cogent arguments jsmirman Feb 2012 #108
Bullshit: there's an app for that nt Dreamer Tatum Feb 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #30
Most workers get 3 beatings a day, ours only get 2. We're 33% nicer. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #32
Forgive if I implied the workers are in any way at fault for anything Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #36
No, but we would have the monetary leverage to save our own people. Zalatix Feb 2012 #86
See, we don't beat our slaves. marmar Feb 2012 #23
"the physical conditions are way, way above average of the norm" TBF Feb 2012 #49
Sounds to me like "Hey, there *might* be a *surprise* inspection on Tuesday at 6:30 a.m." n/t Earth_First Feb 2012 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #31
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #40
So conditions aren't as bad as they are at places with worse conditions? Iggo Feb 2012 #33
I recall some left wing agitator saying one that raouldukelives Feb 2012 #37
The board of the "Fair Labor Association" is full of corporate CEOs. What a joke! Romulox Feb 2012 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #46
It's a significant amount, to be sure. I consider it dishonest not to disclose this fact Romulox Feb 2012 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #50
You quoted a trade group as if it were a NGO or similar. nt Romulox Feb 2012 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #54
"The Fair Labor Association" (sic) is an INDUSTRY GROUP. NOT an NGO! Romulox Feb 2012 #56
This is a joke, right? girl gone mad Feb 2012 #44
IMHO, some of this raises questions about using DU for commercial promotion. nt Romulox Feb 2012 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #52
So anyone who uses an electronic device has no business being concerned about the working conditions Incitatus Feb 2012 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #66
When you're an image-centered brand, "everybody else does it" does NOT cut it. Pholus Feb 2012 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #62
Bwahahahaha...CHECKMATE! I actually PASS your purity test as you stated it. Pholus Feb 2012 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #89
Yes. I imagine you thought this comeback was a real winner. THEN YOU RAN ACROSS ME... Pholus Feb 2012 #90
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #93
Your argument is one of moral equivalence between Apple Corporation Romulox Feb 2012 #97
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #102
"Would you would you in a box...would you would you with a fox." Pholus Feb 2012 #98
Someone's getting seriously worked over here, and it ain't Pholus jsmirman Feb 2012 #109
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #120
I thought you said I wasn't worth debating with. I'll counter that Walmart sells loads too. Pholus Feb 2012 #121
Incidentally, that does prove you ran out of arguments when you resorted to "neener neener" talk. Pholus Feb 2012 #122
Only a very small number. I'm glad we are on the same side on this issue. joshcryer Feb 2012 #59
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #63
Oh yes, I know, and I enjoy our little back and forths. joshcryer Feb 2012 #65
Don't bring facts to the anti-Apple crowd. former9thward Feb 2012 #68
A ridiculous comparison. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #77
No it would not. former9thward Feb 2012 #91
I appreciate the tactics which were brought to bear to make this happen. Very classy. See #82. Pholus Feb 2012 #83
Actually all companies in the U.S. that have life insurance do this. former9thward Feb 2012 #92
In the U.S. foxconn would be sunk under wrongful death lawsuits. Pholus Feb 2012 #100
Many companies use Foxconn former9thward Feb 2012 #106
Okay. Let's put this "everybody does it" thing to bed here. It's simply morally repugnant. Pholus Feb 2012 #110
The Chinese people disagree with you. former9thward Feb 2012 #111
Oh yes. People fight hard when desperate. Fundamental tenet of the "cheap labor" movement. Pholus Feb 2012 #112
Of course they would go to robots if they could. former9thward Feb 2012 #113
Apple says that you too hold a blacksmith's hammer in the brave new "global economy." Pholus Feb 2012 #114
Well my insane leap of logic was already in my previous post former9thward Feb 2012 #115
You make no sense. Why would ruining a perfectly functional TV make this better? Pholus Feb 2012 #116
"the norm" = A poke in the eye with a sharp stick. n/t cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #78
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #79
Not enough? Too many? Who counts? Just call me an Apple hater; I like it. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #80
From "better than the norm!" to "EVERYBODY'S doin' it!" in a few short equivocations. Romulox Feb 2012 #94
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #95
I reject your premise; namely that owning Chinese made products makes Romulox Feb 2012 #96
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #99
The Fair Labor Association is a phony, industry-funded "watchdog" brentspeak Feb 2012 #103
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #105
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #107
Sorry, your OP was corporate PR spin. It got shredded. Pholus Feb 2012 #117
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Feb 2012 #118
We stopped debating when you ran out of new things to say. Pholus Feb 2012 #119
Agreed. I've shown above just how absurd the moral equivalism will get. Pholus Feb 2012 #101
Why did Anti-Apartheid protestors pick on Barclays sudopod Feb 2012 #104
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #98