Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #1
To the brim. byeya Jul 2013 #3
. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #25
Only because the poster does not agree with your view liberal N proud Jul 2013 #5
The poster seems to be obsessed with spewing hatred for Snowden. Can we spell ad hominem. nm rhett o rick Jul 2013 #24
There seems to be a lot of hate thrown at anyone not supporting Snowden on DU liberal N proud Jul 2013 #37
Really. "not supporting Snowden" Is that what you call this OP. Non-support wouldnt require an OP. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #40
In other words... liberal N proud Jul 2013 #44
You cant seem to have a discussion w/o sinking into logical fallacies. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #52
I havedone that countless time in the past weeks liberal N proud Jul 2013 #64
In other words . . . Le Taz Hot Jul 2013 #71
Because I don't fall in line with group think? liberal N proud Jul 2013 #75
I see you've learned a new term. Le Taz Hot Jul 2013 #79
In other words, we can either be with you - or you call us Republicans karynnj Jul 2013 #50
I stand with the Democrats that want more transparency. You can tell me where you stand if you dare. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #51
"I dont care if the OP is facts." Major Hogwash Jul 2013 #74
And once again nothing but snark. Snowden isnt the biggest issue. People are using him as a rhett o rick Jul 2013 #81
I stand with Democrats, including the President karynnj Jul 2013 #77
The court hasnt had a chance to rule on what Booz-Allen is doing today. We arent even sure. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #83
There are two separate issues karynnj Jul 2013 #86
I agree with you on paragraph 1). It's paragraph 2) I have a problem with. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #90
The speculation is based on what he and Greenwald explicitly said. karynnj Jul 2013 #94
So you believe what Greenwald and Snowden say? I dont. I think they will use misdirection as much rhett o rick Jul 2013 #95
If you don't believe that, then why believe ANYTHING they said? karynnj Jul 2013 #96
Group think is very republican like. liberal N proud Jul 2013 #65
they are getting embarassed, the Snowfans. Whisp Jul 2013 #49
Wow are you way off. The NSA has already admitted to what has been revealed. Clapper rhett o rick Jul 2013 #84
With real tyranny, you can't publicly complain about tyranny NoOneMan Jul 2013 #2
I think that's a very good point. In a tyranny there is no transparency and whistle-blowers are rhett o rick Jul 2013 #93
Surveillance of all communications isn't tyranny??!?! reformist2 Jul 2013 #4
You've described Russia, China and Venezuela jeff47 Jul 2013 #36
Yawn. nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #6
That is pretty much the way I've seen him from the start. Tikki Jul 2013 #7
GOLDSTEIN!!! backscatter712 Jul 2013 #8
yup Puzzledtraveller Jul 2013 #27
Nailed it. woo me with science Jul 2013 #53
blah blah blah blah blah.....etc bowens43 Jul 2013 #9
+1 Zorra Jul 2013 #15
Kick because ProSense Jul 2013 #10
There seems to be an attempt to get others to believe criminal activity which has resulted in charge Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #12
Another "Hate Snowden" thread. If nothing else you are persistent, but on the wrong side rhett o rick Jul 2013 #11
More of your talking points and effort of reading a Constitution to fit your needs and not the Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #13
Hold on a minute. Are you suggesting we need to read the Constitution in a way rhett o rick Jul 2013 #22
I have no idea WTH you are talking about. I am referring to the Constitition of Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #38
I quoted you the Constitution. It requires probably cause and Booz-Allen doesnt have probable rhett o rick Jul 2013 #39
I know you do not want the facts on this but the actions taken by the Bush administration Was on the Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #42
Ok let's look at that. Some think that collecting data on all Americans does not require a warrant. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #55
Let's get really honest, the data is origionally collected by communication companies, it has been Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #62
You are making some huge mistakes. The data collected is collected by Booz-Allen. rhett o rick Jul 2013 #69
I explained this to you in the most simple terms, if you want to dribble about who collects this Thinkingabout Jul 2013 #70
They don't give up. cyclezealot Jul 2013 #35
Thanks. Scurrilous Jul 2013 #14
Trash thread. Apophis Jul 2013 #16
Some of the things that Snowden has said are contradicted by the documents he released. Galraedia Jul 2013 #17
Nonsense ronnie624 Jul 2013 #91
64% of the Telegraph's readers support the UK's conservative party... joeybee12 Jul 2013 #18
Yes, in the UK people refer to it as "The Torygraph." QC Jul 2013 #20
I think it's interesting the OP didn't give us the sub-title to this snappyturtle Jul 2013 #66
you have become too boring quinnox Jul 2013 #19
Yet you comment on every one of them. Hmmmmm..... Tarheel_Dem Jul 2013 #30
opinions are like assholes frylock Jul 2013 #21
DU rec...nt SidDithers Jul 2013 #23
Those warnings of tyranny are ringing rather true IMO. dkf Jul 2013 #26
Mike Sell's has a new line of potato chips flavors. Puzzledtraveller Jul 2013 #28
When? whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #29
Now Snowden's Russian lawyer is floating the idea of applying for citizenship flamingdem Jul 2013 #31
R#13 & K, leaving out the word "idealist" in the title n/t UTUSN Jul 2013 #32
this guy might be a right-winger Enrique Jul 2013 #33
At first I balked at reading this, Tory Telegraph and all, but the piece was fairly decent. n/t Scurrilous Jul 2013 #60
Yawn.... Th1onein Jul 2013 #34
Wow. Just wow. Laelth Jul 2013 #41
I just replied to this same point (#66) up thread. Hadn't gotten to snappyturtle Jul 2013 #67
More authoritarian bullshit. 99Forever Jul 2013 #43
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz YAwn L0oniX Jul 2013 #45
I know - the quality of propaganda has really declined as of late! n/t backscatter712 Jul 2013 #46
Can we have a Godwin's type law for the "NARCISSIST!!!!" thing? nt Bonobo Jul 2013 #47
Rec. -nt CakeGrrl Jul 2013 #48
So many steaming piles of propaganda to step around. woo me with science Jul 2013 #54
K&R Thanks for the change of perspective around here. Number23 Jul 2013 #56
Not this shit again. grasswire Jul 2013 #57
No, I think people are perfectly able to be duped without anyone helping them. Number23 Jul 2013 #58
... Scurrilous Jul 2013 #59
... Number23 Jul 2013 #61
A quote from my earlier reply in this thread (#14): Scurrilous Jul 2013 #63
Good Lord, was that thread a hot mess or what?? Number23 Jul 2013 #68
Everybody, please stop with the hyperbole liam_laddie Jul 2013 #78
So much rambling. You could have typed random letters of the alphabet and made the same "point" Number23 Jul 2013 #97
Yawn RetroLounge Jul 2013 #72
What a great thread ohheckyeah Jul 2013 #73
ad hominem, disregarded. nt Deep13 Jul 2013 #76
Oh, no...not an idealist!! The horror... reformist2 Jul 2013 #80
Everything I learned about Neocon propaganda I learned from the Telegraph Pholus Jul 2013 #82
At this point, I wouldn't be surprised Aerows Jul 2013 #87
Already seen those sentiments echoing around. Pholus Jul 2013 #88
All I can is Aerows Jul 2013 #89
Only to those who are hollow. Autumn Jul 2013 #85
'It can't happen here, because we're exceptional and special' ronnie624 Jul 2013 #92
Wow! Great! What an excellent OP, with such a convincing article! NuclearDem Jul 2013 #98
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Edward Snowden is a self-...»Reply #53