HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Liberal imperialism and t...

Tue Aug 27, 2013, 04:30 PM

 

Liberal imperialism and the mythology of "Rwanda" [View all]

Western powers intervened in Rwanda years before the genocide in 1994. France and the US armed and dispatched the sides in the eventual civil war. Rwanda was a French client state. The USG set up the Museveni regime in Uganda, where it then armed and trained the Rwandan Patriotic Front under the leadership of Paul Kagame. He received military training at Ft. Leavenworth.

The RPF invaded Rwanda from Uganda with the intent to take power. They have been accused of committing their own serious atrocities during the invasion. This was the context as the Hutu Power militias whipped up their genocidal campaign against Tutsi civilians. The mass murder was set off in earnest following the assassination of the presidents of Rwanda and Burundi, who were trying to negotiate a peace, in a shootdown of their plane. Subsequent UN and ICC investigations of the events officially left out the mysterious circumstances of the assassination and begin after it.

The war went to the RPF's favor. During the genocide, France invaded Rwanda to secure the retreat of the Hutu Power killers. Repeat: France intervened militarily in Rwanda during the genocide so as to protect the genocidaires and allow them to escape to Congo, where they set up new bases at Hutu refugee camps. (This then set off the events that led to the Congo war and fall of the Mobuto dictatorship thre, after the new RPF-led Rwandan government invaded Congo.)

This example of a Western military intervention in Rwanda, one of several by France and the U.S. that did not stop but actually contributed to the genocide, was a big story at the time in Europe. It has been erased from the U.S. mythology of "Rwanda," however. The baseless confabulation that the Rwandan genocide occurred because of a lack of Western intervention, rather than partly as the result of a Western intervention, is wholly counterfactual. It is found only in the United States, and internationally within a very select class of humanitarian imperialists in the mode of Samantha Power (who are outside the "reality based" community).

Repeat: Rwandan civil war unfolded with the support of dual Western interventions, in part as a proxy war between French and U.S. imperialist interests. France intervened to support the side committing the genocide.

So how is it possible that anyone ever cites the Rwandan genocide as an example of a case when the West "should have" intervened? How is it that Clinton, under whose administration the U.S. armed and trained the RPF army, is taken seriously when he regrets "not having" intervened? How is it that liberal imperialists, now looking for their latest humanitarian intervention in Syria, are not laughed out of the room when they abuse "Rwanda" as an example?

24 replies, 6120 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 24 replies Author Time Post
Reply Liberal imperialism and the mythology of "Rwanda" [View all]
JackRiddler Aug 2013 OP
Democracyinkind Aug 2013 #1
JackRiddler Aug 2013 #2
Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #3
JackRiddler Aug 2013 #4
PETRUS Aug 2013 #5
TorchTheWitch Aug 2013 #6
JackRiddler Aug 2013 #7
JackRiddler Aug 2013 #8
JackRiddler Aug 2013 #9
Alamuti Lotus Aug 2013 #10
JackRiddler Aug 2013 #13
Alamuti Lotus Aug 2013 #14
JackRiddler Aug 2013 #16
xchrom Aug 2013 #11
LWolf Aug 2013 #12
leftstreet Aug 2013 #15
JackRiddler Aug 2013 #17
Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #18
JackRiddler Sep 2013 #19
Blue_Tires Sep 2013 #20
Cal3bg Jan 2014 #21
JackRiddler Jan 2014 #22
JackRiddler Feb 2014 #23
JackRiddler Apr 2014 #24