Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Statement from the Carter Center on the Syria Crisis [View all]
Note that this is on the Carter Center FB Page, but has not yet been posted at: http://www.cartercenter.org/news/pr/index.html
A punitive military response without a U.N. Security Council mandate or broad support from NATO and the Arab League would be illegal under international law and unlikely to alter the course of the war.
It will only harden existing positions and postpone a sorely needed political process to put an end to the catastrophic violence. Instead, all should seek to leverage the consensus among the entire international community, including Russia and Iran, condemning the use of chemical weapons in Syria and bringing under U.N. oversight the countrys stockpile of such weapons.
It is imperative to determine the facts of the attack and present them to the public. Those responsible for the use of chemical weapons must bear personal responsibility, said President Carter. The chemical attack should be a catalyst for redoubling efforts to convene a peace conference, to end hostilities, and urgently to find a political solution.
It will only harden existing positions and postpone a sorely needed political process to put an end to the catastrophic violence. Instead, all should seek to leverage the consensus among the entire international community, including Russia and Iran, condemning the use of chemical weapons in Syria and bringing under U.N. oversight the countrys stockpile of such weapons.
It is imperative to determine the facts of the attack and present them to the public. Those responsible for the use of chemical weapons must bear personal responsibility, said President Carter. The chemical attack should be a catalyst for redoubling efforts to convene a peace conference, to end hostilities, and urgently to find a political solution.
More at: https://www.facebook.com/cartercenter?hc_location=stream
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Yes. At the same time, launching a few missiles might get reluctant parties to a peace
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#50
You could be right. After Bush, and seeing the massive ever-dominant corruption in our
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#71
Exactly and that was brought up in the British Parliament yesterday, the hypocrisy of the
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#72
Sanity: "Those responsible for the use of chemical weapons must bear personal responsibility"
Coyotl
Aug 2013
#2
I'm so glad you have it all figured out, especially the moral backbone aspect. n/t
Jefferson23
Aug 2013
#70
So--you can find a circumstance where you perceive the use of chemical weapons to gas civilians
MADem
Aug 2013
#76
Your comments to me about the OP I posted which supports a similar approach
Jefferson23
Aug 2013
#82
"I" didn't "reject" it--I am just telling you that al-Assad is uninterested in that approach.
MADem
Aug 2013
#83
Well many of his enemies are, we are told at least, OUR enemies also. Al Queda is
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#73
How about we mind our own business and start prosecuting the war criminals we
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#80
Here, let me 'throw down what I believe once again' since it is the overwhelming
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#85
I am saying what I am saying. Angry at you? I am sad for you, and the rest of the minority
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#89
Of course I am saying what I am saying. I think I made that clear and will say it again
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#91
It is a tragedy of epic proportions that conservative Democrats joined with republicans and elected
Zorra
Aug 2013
#7
It was not only conservative Dems joining with Republicans who gave us Reagan.
BlueMTexpat
Aug 2013
#18
No, that's simply not true in the case of the 1980 election, and if you have proof that it is true,
Zorra
Aug 2013
#27
There was liberal opposition to President Carter in the primaries that weakened him enough that he
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#30
I said that he was weakened by Teddy's primary challenge but I also said that there
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#37
Yes, people forget that for some reason. I think that was treason but they got away
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#74
Statistics prove that self-described moderate and conservative Democrats voted for Reagan in
Zorra
Aug 2013
#86
It might be easier to be wise when you are not surrounded by Washington DC hogwash perpetrators and
Maineman
Aug 2013
#43
President Carter made 'Human Rights' the nation's top foreign policy priority.
Octafish
Aug 2013
#23
I was just lectured at 4 am and told that any response other than bombs would be akin to "praying
Dragonfli
Aug 2013
#24
I agree about punishment for whoever was responsible, I will never agree on a military intervention.
idwiyo
Aug 2013
#25
But we threw President Carter under the boss when he defended Edward Snowden, right?
totodeinhere
Aug 2013
#29
I absolutely agree that this needs to be done with the UN, NATO, the Arab League and as many
Number23
Aug 2013
#35
Right -- I mean, what could the man who brokered the Camp David Accords possibly have to teach you?
markpkessinger
Aug 2013
#44
I agree with this. I want to see a consensus before any potential action.
Waiting For Everyman
Aug 2013
#48