Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ElboRuum

(4,717 posts)

33. Science does not require faith.

Reply to reusrename (Reply #31)

Sun Sep 1, 2013, 04:13 PM

Sep 2013

Nor is it for weighing in on policy, nor uncovering conspiracies. I'm sorry to disappoint you but science is not a political tool and it shouldn't be used as such nor considered such. It is this misapprehension of what science is and isn't capable of or what it is for which actually speaks to the degree of ignorance in this country. The political realities of our world must be dealt with in the political sphere.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We live in a society exquisitely dependent ... [View all] Scuba Sep 2013 OP

Du rec. Nt xchrom Sep 2013 #1

"exquisitely dependent" handmade34 Sep 2013 #2

That's funny, sad, and very true. And it's a recipe for massive failure. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #3

Actually, it isn't. ElboRuum Sep 2013 #10

Americans certainly don't have to know everything about science and technology but when... BlueJazz Sep 2013 #12

Exactly. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #16

But was that really was Carl Sagan was saying in that quote? ElboRuum Sep 2013 #21

It's not that they are lacking in "scientific skills" ElboRuum Sep 2013 #24

Your words are true and wise. BlueJazz Sep 2013 #26

One of the best critiques of the average American's mentality I've read. Thanks! Surya Gayatri Sep 2013 #27

I think that's a terribly naive point of view that mirrors the excuses, and reasons, for slavery. jtuck004 Sep 2013 #14

I agree. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #17

Terribly naive? ElboRuum Sep 2013 #20

No, and the logical end isn''t to pose an outlandish and impossible answer, either. jtuck004 Sep 2013 #35

Interesting points. ElboRuum Sep 2013 #41

Interesting how you conflate points just to erect your little scree... jtuck004 Sep 2013 #42

Of course. ElboRuum Sep 2013 #43

The problem here Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #28

Wasn't Neil DeGrasse Tyson ElboRuum Sep 2013 #30

I sure do wish I could believe you, but I have little faith. reusrename Sep 2013 #31

Science does not require faith. ElboRuum Sep 2013 #33

Read the graphic. It doesn't say .... Scuba Sep 2013 #37

That's not how it reads. ElboRuum Sep 2013 #38

k and r--and, sadly, the anti-science, anti-intellectual crowd wants to keep it that way. niyad Sep 2013 #4

Hey, I built that skydive forever Sep 2013 #5

cool! progressoid Sep 2013 #7

I'm jealous! Stargazer09 Sep 2013 #29

It's miracles. Jesus done 'em. nt valerief Sep 2013 #6

How few 'key' people could we lose...... daleanime Sep 2013 #8

We live in a society which expects us to be clothed. ElboRuum Sep 2013 #9

DURec leftstreet Sep 2013 #11

hell yeah pasto76 Sep 2013 #13

We need more STEM majors! LOL reformist2 Sep 2013 #15

I'm okay fadedrose Sep 2013 #18

Sound and pitchers? ElboRuum Sep 2013 #22

beer? fadedrose Sep 2013 #23

You know, I think that's false advertising. ElboRuum Sep 2013 #25

U gotta leave the door open & hang a few baloons fadedrose Sep 2013 #40

It's called SPECIALIZATION, genius. Dreamer Tatum Sep 2013 #19

You could also take the statement at face value: Quantess Sep 2013 #34

True. ElboRuum Sep 2013 #39

there is only a "critical mass" of the specialized knowledge needed... yawnmaster Sep 2013 #32

+1 K&R nt Jasana Sep 2013 #36