Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)That was pretty goddamned incoherent, frankly. [View all]
I found that address to be an eloquently delivered ball of fundamental incoherence.
The rub: Gas sucks, dead children are terrible, so I want to attack, but we're working on a diplomatic solution, yet if you're on the right and love the military, or if you're on the left and love human rights, you totally have to look at the dead kids on YouTube and get behind me on attacking Syria even though I've asked Congress to suspend the vote and we're pursuing diplomacy so there won't be an attack, or something.
Gobldeygook. Tell me I'm wrong.
536 replies, 143466 views
536 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Five years between Vietnam and Reagan's election "to make America strong again"
bananas
Sep 2013
#369
Rachel was just talking about this. The US HAS destroyed nearly all its stockpiles.
Hekate
Sep 2013
#237
some people are so mad at the country for various things they'll be in denial about stuff like this.
dionysus
Sep 2013
#422
Please explain why it was not complex to destroy 90% of the stockpile...
former9thward
Sep 2013
#443
"I state only facts," you say, just before blaming Russia for all of Syria's dead.
Comrade Grumpy
Sep 2013
#460
There is generally a good precedent that you let them know that all options are on the table
CAG
Sep 2013
#192
You noticed the Unitary Executive thing, too? He was directly referencing the Youngstown decision,
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#76
That it went right over the head of the OP is understandable, but regrettable. He did something
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#101
When he said that he had the authority to act, but believed that this authority was
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#149
That's the second time I've heard that from his lips: Unitary Executive, GOP wetdream since Nixon...
Hekate
Sep 2013
#234
Yes, it's so important to read between the lines to really understand this president.
gtar100
Sep 2013
#365
Pootie desperately needs the situation to be status quo ante bellum or he's out a small fortune.
MADem
Sep 2013
#213
There was no drama in Obama's brief remark. You're trying to create some, though, and I'm
MADem
Sep 2013
#525
I hate to tell you this, but even the KKK and those Stormfront nuts are Obama's constituents.
MADem
Sep 2013
#530
You apparently don't understand, won't grasp what I am saying, and I'm tired of arguing with you.
MADem
Sep 2013
#535
I take great comfort in the knowledge that the number of people that think that Putin
Number23
Sep 2013
#495
Military strikes in national security interest of the US. Make my children safer.
The Link
Sep 2013
#4
Not only was it incoherent, I had the impression that the President knew it.
winter is coming
Sep 2013
#6
I am ONE - maybe the only one? "America looks like a warmonger" . . . damm straight.
ConcernedCanuk
Sep 2013
#357
Pootie doesn't want the USA to target any piers in Tartus, that's the real bottom line.
MADem
Sep 2013
#267
Well, I'm having a hard time understanding because frankly, it makes no sense.
Llewlladdwr
Sep 2013
#102
Bwahaha! Still trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory! How many lost on popcorn stock?
freshwest
Sep 2013
#455
I don't think a lot of the detractors on this thread are going to like the home page today either...
MADem
Sep 2013
#457
Right-Wing Media's Love Affair With Putin Continues Over Syria Weapons Proposal
freshwest
Sep 2013
#290
I dont think he even really neede to give the speech..unless we were bombing tomorrow
NightWatcher
Sep 2013
#11
It was scheduled on the eve of the Senate vote, and I believe it was originally intended
winter is coming
Sep 2013
#60
The whole world was watching or listening. Every word was deliberate and had purpose.
NYC_SKP
Sep 2013
#16
I heard the man ask for some time to continue to pursue a diplomatic solution to completion.
Skidmore
Sep 2013
#28
The glory days are no more, and peace is bor-ring. Speaking of the rule of balls:
freshwest
Sep 2013
#474
Some posters on this site know only one gear. And they crank that gear right into a tree. nt
bluestate10
Sep 2013
#506
I agree. I understood what the President was doing. Diplomacy with a big stick at the ready
bluestate10
Sep 2013
#507
It was perfectly clear if you didnt have your fingers in your ears going
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2013
#190
Ha...looks like the one who almost got blocked today who people say is rude ALL
Laura PourMeADrink
Sep 2013
#513
Thanks for the summary version. I wasn't about to sit through the whole thing.
BlueStreak
Sep 2013
#47
Very weird observation. Reagan dyed his whole head at 80+ and PBO is going gray at 50-something
Hekate
Sep 2013
#228
What's most disheartening is we are wasting so much time and effort on this
Snake Plissken
Sep 2013
#57
Well, I think you're wrong, but you're looking for approval here, so I'll leave it at that.
MADem
Sep 2013
#62
So you and a maybe a couple hundred others are members of his "fan club" big deal.
4bucksagallon
Sep 2013
#366
That's pretty asinine. Those of us calling you out all disagree with the OP....
Hekate
Sep 2013
#531
+ a million, Summer. I 100% agree with MADem that this OP is nothing but a Will Pitt "look at me!!"
Number23
Sep 2013
#434
We are going to buy Assad's cooperation, just like we always do and call it a 'diplomatic solution'
Snake Plissken
Sep 2013
#161
No they aren't. They have a direct and DIRE interest in averting missile strikes.
MADem
Sep 2013
#256
That is a tiny port not capable of handling aircraft carriers, it's basically a re-supply depot
Snake Plissken
Sep 2013
#274
Yes, Russia had a lot to lose. So they put the squeeze on Assad. What's so hard to understand?
freshwest
Sep 2013
#518
It's a malady of the those who have intelligence without wisdom: a tendency to jump to their
alcibiades_mystery
Sep 2013
#284
Yes--I am. On a batshit insane thread, I find the poster who sees a 'glint' in the President's
msanthrope
Sep 2013
#95
The we "don't do pinprick strikes" thing obviously refers to the fact that America has such an
arewenotdemo
Sep 2013
#454
^^^^THIS post makes this trainwreck of an OP worthwhile. I wish I could rec this post of yours.^^^^^
MADem
Sep 2013
#145
+1, Quaker Bill. See, all you people who wished you could Rec this, I just did! :-) nt
Hekate
Sep 2013
#271
"he had no shame in explicitly identifying and defending American exceptionalism"
winter is coming
Sep 2013
#137
"And a failure to stand against the use of chemical weapons would... embolden Iran" - Obama
grahamhgreen
Sep 2013
#99
The one thing the President got wrong was suggesting that the 'Right' support our military
Snake Plissken
Sep 2013
#134
And let's not forget the reason he is 200 votes short in the House - 72% of all American voters
truedelphi
Sep 2013
#254
Ha. It's incoherent to understand the desire to stop a dictator from gassing people? GEEZ nt
Laura PourMeADrink
Sep 2013
#215
Are you serious? Hardly the same. Bush and Cheney were lying and making shit
Laura PourMeADrink
Sep 2013
#282
And what about Kerry's claim that Syria's chemical weapons are a threat to the US?
Doctor_J
Sep 2013
#381
Why yes--coming from the head of a country that is the chief weapons supplier to the world
eridani
Sep 2013
#360
circumstances required an entire new speech and he seemed to keep half of the old one
carolinayellowdog
Sep 2013
#222
Will is one of the "cool kids" who will lose his street cred if he ever admits he was wrong
scheming daemons
Sep 2013
#314
What is with the constant name calling? Other poster calls Will a fool, then you
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#416
I don't think it was as incoherent as all that. I think you're wrong on this one. nt
Hekate
Sep 2013
#241
YOu aren't wrong, but we have to be less wrong than the republicans. Is this the way?
Mellow Drama
Sep 2013
#276
When the wall came down and the cold war ended I thought this world police shit would stop.
L0oniX
Sep 2013
#283
It was coherent to anyone with a triple digit IQ and no anti-Obama agenda
scheming daemons
Sep 2013
#312
My fellow Americans, I need some some new speechwriters. Or at least a copyeditor to make sure part
avaistheone1
Sep 2013
#320
Your title sounds like something Newt Gingrich would say, with that "frankly" tick.
SunSeeker
Sep 2013
#351
Like I've said before. we know who's really running the media and the gov't in this country
Roland99
Sep 2013
#387
Yep! "Obey international norms, or we'll violate an international norm and blow your shit up."
backscatter712
Sep 2013
#374
He sounded a lot like somebody who had the opponent inside his loop and can't adjust
Lee-Lee
Sep 2013
#380
First thing I said to my wife when it was over: "I don't really know what he just said!"
beerandjesus
Sep 2013
#400
RE: Splicing some stuff about diplomacy into an already prepared pro-war speech at the last minute.
No DUplicitous DUpe
Sep 2013
#480
Hey stonecutter357, Librarian's are awesome people. They do have that nasty habit of saying shhh
Autumn
Sep 2013
#412
Should have used the time to say: Syria looks like we can find a sollution.. so let me use this
glowing
Sep 2013
#469
Poll: 69% of Americans Viewed Obama’s Syria Speech Positively, 61% Favor His Approach
Tx4obama
Sep 2013
#496