Mesh Net, is what you are talking about. n/t (Reply #27)

In the discussion thread: Destroying the Right to Be Left Alone [View all]

Response to MADem (Reply #19)

Mon Sep 23, 2013, 11:16 AM

TheJames (120 posts)

27. Mesh Net, is what you are talking about. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

79 replies	Author	Time	Post
Destroying the Right to Be Left Alone [View all]	xchrom	Sep 2013	OP
It Won't Change Until Americans Have Had Enough	cantbeserious	Sep 2013	#1
Yep.	Gormy Cuss	Sep 2013	#22
Unfortunately when they have had enough it will be long too late to do anything.	former9thward	Sep 2013	#37
k&r for exposure. n/t	Laelth	Sep 2013	#2
AutoCommonDreamsDURec	KG	Sep 2013	#3
Two philosophies in conflict with really high stakes:	Pholus	Sep 2013	#4
Internet - The Aerosol Can of the 21st Century	Johnny Ready	Sep 2013	#5
EVERYTHING is created before the effect to society is completely understood.	randome	Sep 2013	#25
[b]The Unknown Unknowns[/b]	KoKo	Sep 2013	#6
In the last week,	Cryptoad	Sep 2013	#7
While the invasion of my privacy is not an issue I would change my vote to Romney ....	marble falls	Sep 2013	#9
yea Romney and the GOP would be doing things alot different!	Cryptoad	Sep 2013	#14
But the Democrats would be doing something very different if Romney were POTUS	Fumesucker	Sep 2013	#23
Love those Circular Red Herrings,,,,	Cryptoad	Sep 2013	#29
More satire, eh?	Fumesucker	Sep 2013	#31
maybe you will make it,,,,, I will keep my little toad toes crossed for ya!	Cryptoad	Sep 2013	#33
Reading comprehension much? I loathe Romney. I support the President except on privacy....	marble falls	Sep 2013	#36
Obama Haters' seems to crop up in almost every post you make.	Autumn	Sep 2013	#18
Please reread my comment. I support the Presient except on privacy, Gitmo and.....	marble falls	Sep 2013	#39
I think your response was meant for crypttoad.	Autumn	Sep 2013	#41
Sorry! Even gentle critisism of the President brings down a raft of tone deaf ....	marble falls	Sep 2013	#43
Some genius is going to have to invent the concept of "private internets."	MADem	Sep 2013	#8
Like connecting directly to the cloud with almost no computer - all you'd need is a screen and ...	marble falls	Sep 2013	#10
I had a discussion with a military planner - scholar about "virtual reality"	MADem	Sep 2013	#16
even a direct ip connection has an isp that gathers info & sells that info.	Sunlei	Sep 2013	#20
Maybe "personal servers".	rrneck	Sep 2013	#13
My technical skills are probably less honed than yours!	MADem	Sep 2013	#19
Mesh Net, is what you are talking about. n/t	TheJames	Sep 2013	#27
Sounds good to me! nt	MADem	Sep 2013	#28
Are we throwing years of "Keep the Internet Public" out the window????	Cryptoad	Sep 2013	#15
Well, that IS a consideration. Perhaps there could be multiple levels of "internet."	MADem	Sep 2013	#21
The Internet doesn't work that way.	jeff47	Sep 2013	#24
And that's how the phone used to work. You picked up the receiver, you cranked the crank, and	MADem	Sep 2013	#26
No, phones didn't work that way.	jeff47	Sep 2013	#30
Not in 1920 it wasn't.	MADem	Sep 2013	#45
Yes, it really was.	jeff47	Sep 2013	#61
I'm afraid you just are not taking my point, for reasons I can't quite fathom.	MADem	Sep 2013	#62
That's because you aren't bothering to actually read my posts.	jeff47	Sep 2013	#65
Your construct involves "the internet" to make the connection, though.	MADem	Sep 2013	#67
And that's why your construct won't work.	jeff47	Sep 2013	#69
No point in continuing this conversation.	MADem	Sep 2013	#70
I'm not the one locked in	jeff47	Sep 2013	#73
Immediate gratification wasn't ever my point.	MADem	Sep 2013	#74
I'm setting no parameters	jeff47	Sep 2013	#75
Well, yeah--you are. Today/for free/the internet are parameters.	MADem	Sep 2013	#76
No, they're not. I'm using the one condition you started with.	jeff47	Sep 2013	#78
I think you need to reread what I wrote, originally.	MADem	Sep 2013	#79
Depends on what you mean by "an end-to-end single electrical circuit."	FarCenter	Sep 2013	#49
Funny, though, how many cranks ended up on the interweb!	marble falls	Sep 2013	#44
OK, you win the thread....!	MADem	Sep 2013	#46
Yea in a fantasy world	Cryptoad	Sep 2013	#32
Feel free to provide links.	jeff47	Sep 2013	#34
Any commerical OS can provide a backdoor.......	Cryptoad	Sep 2013	#35
No.	jeff47	Sep 2013	#38
No,, just the voice of experience ,,,,,,,,, nt	Cryptoad	Sep 2013	#40
You can sort of do that now	FarCenter	Sep 2013	#48
Yes, but what I envision would be much less onerous.	MADem	Sep 2013	#50
K&R but make no mistake, it's not the technology. Like so many previous wrong turns,	Egalitarian Thug	Sep 2013	#11
hi	MichaelKelley	Sep 2013	#12
Keeping out the prying eyes of the government isn't enough.	LuvNewcastle	Sep 2013	#17
why do I need this?	hfojvt	Sep 2013	#42
Well, I'm all for the "safety nannies" who tell people to not drink and text while driving.	MADem	Sep 2013	#47
well who isn't?	hfojvt	Sep 2013	#52
Well, if your head hit the pavement and you had no medical insurance....	MADem	Sep 2013	#53
and yet, for all those people might care about me	hfojvt	Sep 2013	#55
Wow.	MADem	Sep 2013	#56
I am pretty sure	hfojvt	Sep 2013	#58
Again, wow.	MADem	Sep 2013	#59
The line between care and control is a fine one.	Pholus	Sep 2013	#60
I just had a loved one killed by someone who felt the rules didn't apply to them.	MADem	Sep 2013	#63
Sorry to hear that.	Pholus	Sep 2013	#71
I just don't see any relation between texting and abortion.	MADem	Sep 2013	#72
So money is greater than freedoms? Where does that stop? What you eat, drink, etc?	The Straight Story	Sep 2013	#66
Way to miss the point.	MADem	Sep 2013	#68
There are differences, as you must be able to see.	Savannahmann	Sep 2013	#51
except there is, or should be	hfojvt	Sep 2013	#54
Kicked and recommended.	Uncle Joe	Sep 2013	#57
K & R	Quantess	Sep 2013	#64
The intent of those who wrote and adopted the US Constitution could not be clearer	99th_Monkey	Sep 2013	#77

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.