Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

iverglas

(38,549 posts)
55. I hope people actually read your link re Canadian wait times
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 08:02 PM
Mar 2012

Last edited Sun Mar 4, 2012, 08:51 PM - Edit history (1)

The context is:

Posted on June 25, 2009
Response to the Senator accusing Canada of having "staggering" wait times from Canadian Surgeon and Hospital Executive Dr. David Zelt

By Dr. David Zelt
The Kingston Whig Standard
6/24/09

Dr. David Zelt, chief of staff and vice-president, medical administration, at Kingston General Hospital, sent the following reply to McConnell.

and what he said was:

Your researchers have taken data and interpreted it incorrectly, with the result that your information is inaccurate.

Your statement to the Senate: “Today, the average wait time for (hip replacement) surgery at KGH is about 196 days.” In fact, our actual average hip replacement wait time is 91 days — less than half of what you stated.

Your statement to the Senate: “What about knee replacements? Well, at Kingston General, the average wait time is 340 days, or almost a year from the moment that the doctor says you need a new knee.” In fact, our average wait time for knee replacements is 109 days.

Three months' wait for a surgery for a non-life-threatening condition, from referral to surgery? When it is available to every resident of the province on equal footing? Is someone actually concerned about this?

I took my partner to the ER just before midnight on a Saturday night a couple of years ago because symptoms he was describing sounded to me like a retinal detachment. I was right. After two hours there and very complete examination, he was told to report to the eye clinic at the hospital in our city that is the designated in-patient eye surgery facility the next morning. He was admitted and had to wait all day for the surgery, because on a Sunday only two ORs were operating and he got bumped by every car accident and emergency caesarian section that came along. All in all, it was about 19 hours from ER arrival to surgery. It was emergency surgery, needed immediately to preserve his eye, and it was done immediately, and the wait time was mainly associated with it happening at midnight on a Saturday.

More from your link:

Your statement to the Senate: “And for cardiac bypass surgery, patients in Ontario are told they may have to wait six months for a surgery that Americans can often get right away.” In fact, the median wait time for cardiac surgery in Ontario is 16 days (32 days at KGH).

That is the median time. Half waited longer, half waited less time. Again, if the situation is an emergency, it is treated as such, and surgery is essentially immediate.

I'm wondering what your point was, too.

As I sit here with my third cast on the leg I broke just over three weeks ago, having had attention (ambulance, three consults, 3 sets of xrays, plaster cast) first in the ER, then a consult week later to decide whether to have surgery, then the surgery a week later to install a plate and screws and put on another temporary cast, then a consult a week later to examine the wound and replace the cast, then this week another set of xrays and maybe one of those air cast things ...

I was really quite pissed about spending nearly 8 hours in the ER the first time. Apparently I made the mistake of breaking my leg the same day half the city broke or dislocated something; two life-threatening orthopaedic emergencies, even (whatever they might be), I was told when I finally got pissy, while I and everybody else were waiting. And frankly I'm pissed about the two-week wait for surgery, when I was told at the ER it would be within a week. But really.

So far it has cost me $45 for a medically-necessary ambulance trip (waived if I were low-income or otherwise eligible), several taxi fares, and a total of maybe $50 for prescriptions. And a little under $100 for a private wheelchair rental for two months. I'll have a few more taxi fares for a few more hospital visits before it's over. So, about $400 out of pocket all told, all for incidentals.

I paid $750 last year for Ontario health insurance, at tax time, because I'm high-income. (That's the second-highest level; the previous year I paid the top rate, $900. The scale ranges from 0 for low-income to $900; people receiving social assistance and seniors also receive drug coverage.)


editing to note: I have these out of pocket expenses because I'm self-employed and do not purchase any supplemental insurance. If I worked for the government or an employer of any significant size, I would have private supplemental group insurance which would cover my prescriptions, taxis and wheelchair rental, possibly with some sort of annual deductible which would not be significant.
Remove the middle man, I mean the Insurance Co. midnight Mar 2012 #1
Also get advertising out of it. Initech Mar 2012 #5
BUT Advertise the prices so people can compare. BOHICA12 Mar 2012 #58
doctors themselves are much to blame for high costs crimsonblue Mar 2012 #6
There's blame to go around lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #7
Insurance companies can refuse to pay inflated prices. That somewhat helps in keeping consumers, shcrane71 Mar 2012 #8
My daughter is almost a quarter million dollars in debt for medical school. tblue37 Mar 2012 #30
+10,000 eridani Mar 2012 #31
Doctors in the USA are basically businessmen (and women) Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2012 #53
and dentists like you to have bad teeth Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2012 #54
Doctor rates for non-insurance people are higher than insurance people - dramatically. cbdo2007 Mar 2012 #17
I found the opposite. Kablooie Mar 2012 #49
Then why is the per person cost in Germany lower than in Canada? bornskeptic Mar 2012 #50
Yes, but...... izquierdista Mar 2012 #2
The film Sicko interviewed a British doctor who was making about $150,000 a year under socialized aint_no_life_nowhere Mar 2012 #20
I read somewhere, tho, that France is having trouble finding enuf qualified doctors. Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #29
where did you read this? CreekDog Mar 2012 #35
I could bore you with the economics of health care.. crimsonblue Mar 2012 #3
Plus... crimsonblue Mar 2012 #4
I had to wait 2 months in the US KT2000 Mar 2012 #9
I was refused care by my insurance company.... Yooperman Mar 2012 #13
at one prominent hospital in Canada, average wait time for knee surgery is 109 days. crimsonblue Mar 2012 #16
And in the U.S. if you don't have the cash or the insurance dflprincess Mar 2012 #22
And in the US, you'll die a miserably, painful death for not having insurance. shcrane71 Mar 2012 #48
anecdotal CreekDog Mar 2012 #37
And that is different from my mother's six-month wait how? haele Mar 2012 #41
Wait times worst in US and Canada, other nations much better SOS Mar 2012 #44
I hope people actually read your link re Canadian wait times iverglas Mar 2012 #55
Right winger mythology, again smaug Mar 2012 #10
thanks for the ad hominem and straw men.... crimsonblue Mar 2012 #18
Please explain what you mean by "hysterical"? CreekDog Mar 2012 #38
Exactly, smaug (and I love your name - Smaug is awesome, and wicked witty) Benedict Cumberbatch anneboleyn Mar 2012 #25
Way to catapult the propaganda KeepItReal Mar 2012 #12
What propaganda? crimsonblue Mar 2012 #19
Do patients in Canada or France wait for an MRI... Chemical Bill Mar 2012 #23
not long blublu Mar 2012 #34
The waits are longer in the US for such surgeries for people without health coverage CreekDog Mar 2012 #36
Wait times? Cherry-pick much? How about the bottom line: NashvilleLefty Mar 2012 #40
how about 3500? I had four in one year, and they all cost Gabi Hayes Mar 2012 #11
I was going to say the same. MRIs are at least 3,500 and more... anneboleyn Mar 2012 #24
$3500 is like the manufacturers suggested retail price Brother Buzz Mar 2012 #27
They do one MRI then charge per view which is nothing more than virtual unbundling of Lint Head Mar 2012 #14
TL;DR - Price gouging. backscatter712 Mar 2012 #15
Here's an article for your consideration... crimsonblue Mar 2012 #21
Nevermind. Sparkly Mar 2012 #52
Unless you're including drugs, the Canadian cost is way lower... Puzzler Mar 2012 #26
$60-70 in the UAE for an MRI JCMach1 Mar 2012 #28
The BIG Difference: bvar22 Mar 2012 #32
What would be most interesting SATIRical Mar 2012 #33
I bet the janitors are equally qualified. Here's a link to some salaries. Generally make less in Fra uppityperson Mar 2012 #39
Thanks. So considering SATIRical Mar 2012 #42
The easiest most noticable way to cut outgo is to pay providers less.It's happened to me, as a nurse uppityperson Mar 2012 #43
Comparison of four cities SOS Mar 2012 #45
We pay more for poorer outcomes. We need nationalized health care now! Comrade Grumpy Mar 2012 #46
we need a cap on prices pure and simple pitohui Mar 2012 #47
Mom had a stroke. five days and bill for $98000. Now glinda Mar 2012 #51
One thing I've noticed since more people are getting stuck with high out of pocket plans is that dflprincess Mar 2012 #56
i just had one and my co-pay was 280.00 spanone Mar 2012 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why an MRI costs $1,080 i...»Reply #55