General Discussion

djnicadress

(39 posts)

30. sounds like they really got nothing

Wed Oct 16, 2013, 04:37 PM

Oct 2013

Speaking on background, the official said the House bill would have put "at risk" the basic structure of the law's tax credits and subsidies for individuals "by making them contingent on an IG prospectively certifying that the system was sound. This would have caused unnecessary uncertainty" and delayed health care coverage for millions. In contrast, the version agreed to in the Senate would have the Health and Human Services secretary certify to Congress that eligibility is being verified. The official said that the compromise has the Inspector General "perform a retrospective analysis, which is consistent with the traditional role of an IG, and will not impede or affect the provision of benefits to individuals through the ACA."

http://www.nationaljournal.com/white-house/white-house-debt-ceiling-deal-s-obamacare-change-not-ransom-20131016?mrefid=HomepageRiver

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The bastards got income verification in [View all] Bunnahabhain Oct 2013 OP

It was there already. Just tightened the language up a bit. Kber Oct 2013 #1

To be fair MnAttorney Oct 2013 #2

I believe it went from a sampling of verification to 100% verification. Similar to what many lenders okaawhatever Oct 2013 #19

Basically the RepubliBaggers (R) are making BIG GOVERNMENT BIGGER Berlum Oct 2013 #24

I can't believe someone on DU would post crap from the Washington Times. FSogol Oct 2013 #3

I dunno, being that was in the ACA already , ... oldhippie Oct 2013 #4

don't see anything wrong with that ... srican69 Oct 2013 #5

Exactly Bunnahabhain Oct 2013 #6

This is great! More IRS jobs, increasing spending & the size of gov't. Thanks, republicans! displacedtexan Oct 2013 #13

You're assuming they will hire additional workers to meet the add'l requirements. I think they're okaawhatever Oct 2013 #22

"They" who? displacedtexan Oct 2013 #27

The Republicans who supported increasing the income verification from sampling to 100%. nt okaawhatever Oct 2013 #29

Moonie Times??? SamYeager Oct 2013 #7

Jesus christ people Bunnahabhain Oct 2013 #8

Income verification was already in the ACA. Republicans got NOTHING, as Michael Corleone bluestate10 Oct 2013 #9

On CBS News the other night, they said that Obama had been planning to LuvNewcastle Oct 2013 #10

"To say that it is miniscule is probably giving it too much credit" pinboy3niner Oct 2013 #11

Oh noeesssss!!11 Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #12

I already submit tax returns for college grants and pay stubs for food stamps. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #14

Bwahahahaha!!! JoePhilly Oct 2013 #15

Jay Carney on the income verification - "we're fine with it". n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #16

I had to provide income verification to the VA Kaleva Oct 2013 #17

Fig leaf for the GOP? AlinPA Oct 2013 #18

You could well be correct Bunnahabhain Oct 2013 #21

It was already in the law, just not implemented yet. WilliamPitt Oct 2013 #20

For what? Government job? Food Stamps? Assistance to women with dependant children? question everything Oct 2013 #23

Insurance subsidies under the ACA. n/t Chan790 Oct 2013 #25

The Republicans complained about the IRS getting between you and doc03 Oct 2013 #26

I figure they think it will scare some folks away from seeking subsidies Bunnahabhain Oct 2013 #28

sounds like they really got nothing djnicadress Oct 2013 #30

What they apparently got was to kick the debt limit issue a few months down the road, PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #31