Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are people who believe Abortion should be legal but rare objectively anti-Choice? [View all]Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)46. Rare would include other forms of birth control being readily available
and encouraged, none of that abstinence only stuff being taught in schools, etc. In most cases, having an abortion is a somewhat unpleasant event. If the necessity can be avoided in the first place, all the better ... but when all else fails, a woman should have no impediments to terminating an unwanted or dangerous pregnancy.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Are people who believe Abortion should be legal but rare objectively anti-Choice? [View all]
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
OP
Depends on the meaning of rare. If rare means that you improve general conditions (access to birth
Mass
Nov 2013
#3
I think the word "rare" is problematic as it ignores how desperately more clinics are needed...
bettyellen
Nov 2013
#11
It's not about 'ceding' the damn word. It's about not using a measure of frequency in policy or
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#77
There have been recent posts that suggest that focusing on those issues is a form of "slut shaming"
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#6
I'm not really eligible I suppose - so I should preferably keep my opinions to myself on this issue.
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#24
How can they not be objectively anti choice and yet provide most of the cover
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#22
That's a fair point - I did use the Orwell Language (filtered through my memories of the Bush Years)
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#34
Clearly they feel the right to keep count and set limits. Other people's bodies are for them to
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#28
So this goes beyond mere ignorance in your opinion - people who use this language
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#31
They get conflated because some people who choose to have an abortion are punished
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#37
The argument is, as I understand it, that if you are in favor of keeping abortion legal
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#44
i see. i think there are good reasons for having abortions, and bad ones. each case is unique. but
dionysus
Nov 2013
#45
What are bad reasons to have an abortion? I guess that would be my one question nt
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#47
this story is an outlier, i would assume, but there was the case of this girl in college that
dionysus
Nov 2013
#48
oh, anti choicers would have a field day with that. but i don't think the sort of thing i witnessed
dionysus
Nov 2013
#50
Legal but rare means that education and contraceptives are easily avaiable to all women
Agnosticsherbet
Nov 2013
#52
But does the former create cover for those who think that Abortion should be illegal?
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#55
You're conflating people who say "rare" because they want to restrict abortion with people
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#54
The problem is that words mean things. And using language like "rare" is dangerous.
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#57
Whoosh. Of course the word "rare" is subjective. That's why it can't and shouldn't
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#66
whoosh? whatever, you are ceding a fucking word. the "rare" verbiage was pulled from platform for a
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#67
What's asinine is attempting to label pro-choice people anti-choice because they haven't
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#68
similar to those who believe in "secular gay marriage" but also believe being gay is immoral
La Lioness Priyanka
Nov 2013
#70
yes, i have met a few people. usually extremely religious but with a strong belief that govt should
La Lioness Priyanka
Nov 2013
#78
well thanks for confirming that i wasn't the only person who knew these people
La Lioness Priyanka
Nov 2013
#95
It stigmatizes women's health care choices. It implies that it's a decision that should NOT be made.
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#72
I don't think it stigmatizes anything, although some may choose to defensively take it that way.
dawg
Nov 2013
#79
The more I read, the more I realize this is a really interesting and nuanced issue.
dawg
Nov 2013
#83
thanks. yes, I think the phrase was effective at the time. but we're evolving
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#84