Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kennedy assasination: is it more WHO than how? [View all]duffyduff
(3,251 posts)68. Are you kidding me? There isn't anybody other than Oswald who did it.
EVERYTHING points to Oswald--the conspiracy theorists rely on speculation and innuendo. They have NOTHING, they never have had anything, and they never WILL have anything.
After fifty years, somebody would have come forward, but nobody ever has, and nobody ever will. That's because nobody other than Oswald did it.
BTW, that so-called "magic bullet" DID do the damage. It has been proven over and over and over and over through forensic evidence from the earliest days of the Warren Commission to the present.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This past article makes a case against the CIA. It also argues the relevance to today's politics.
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#1
Nope. The article is nonsense. JFK was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Period.
duffyduff
Nov 2013
#69
Sure, I can cut and paste links too. What's up with the bullets on the bottom?
The Midway Rebel
Nov 2013
#43
Nonsense. You are unconvincing. But you have your reasons I am sure. Carry on.
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#34
You read the Warren report. Good for you. What were the results of the detailed examination
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#32
Huge hole in back, tiny hole in front. Doesn't fly. Sorry. Have a good evening. Done.
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#39
Tiny hole in the front of what? Do you even know what you're talking about?
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#41
Cool. Someone knows how to draw cartoons. I understand your position. But it is not proof.
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#47
It's 100% consistent with autopsy photos, x-rays, and the Zapruder film.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#50
I am claiming that all that "evidence" has grave chain of custody issues wherein the potential
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#59
+1000, but you are arguing with people who love the mystery! Logic does not apply. n-t
Logical
Nov 2013
#35
JFK was interfering with the profits and power of many powerful people steeped in
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#48
Oswald acted alone. There is NO evidence after five decades anybody else was responsible.
duffyduff
Nov 2013
#26
If there was any doubt that there are pros on this site, we have our answer now.
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#28
"If there was any doubt that there are pros on this site, we have our answer now."
zappaman
Nov 2013
#38
Kennedy had managed to piss off a lot of the right people in his 2 years in office
Warpy
Nov 2013
#30
We think somewhat alike on this subject -- here is the last paragraph of a post I made today
Samantha
Nov 2013
#45
Conspiracy theory propagated by notorious birther and right-wing hack Jerome Corsi.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#56
Jerome Corsi? You'll to explain further because there's no such link to the guy
Mother Muckraker
Nov 2013
#61
No, there's a pretty blatant attempt to invoke guilt by asociation though.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#70
Yet more proof that the desire for the JFK Assassination to have been a deep, complex, shadowy
Aristus
Nov 2013
#65