Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stainless

(717 posts)
30. Almost everything has been released?
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 04:30 PM
Nov 2013

I don't think so. I was reminded recently that most of the files were locked away for 75 years. A time when most of those who were old enough to remember the event would be long gone. Where did you get your information?

You seem surprised n/t sharp_stick Nov 2013 #1
Not terribly - he reflects my own feelings in that there's a great deal bullwinkle428 Nov 2013 #6
He did not propose an actual theory--merely surmised there is more about JFK murder than gov. Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #2
But it seems there are many that really don't make an effort to bullwinkle428 Nov 2013 #5
True Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #7
still, one should have a theory. because things happen somehow. mechanistically. Schema Thing Nov 2013 #20
Almost everything has been released. This STILL hasn't satisfied the CTs. duffyduff Nov 2013 #12
How do you know "almost everything has been released"? Is there a list of items to be checked as riderinthestorm Nov 2013 #17
The government itself said in the late 70's, that "a conspiracy was probably involved" in the death whathehell Nov 2013 #22
Almost everything has been released? Stainless Nov 2013 #30
ALMOST everything! Isn't that good enough? ALMOST! Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #47
The law was changed. HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #57
+1 treestar Nov 2013 #74
CT'ers as you try to disparagingly call them, have open minds. It's those rhett o rick Nov 2013 #77
"Open minds"? Thats a laugh. HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #85
It's very closed minded to categorize all people that are skeptical as some kind rhett o rick Nov 2013 #95
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Nov 2013 #106
You are equating DUers to Birthers? Nice, and you deniers wonder why a majority of the people doubt sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #101
No. CTers to birthers. HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #104
Really? What percentage of 'things' have been released? EOTE Nov 2013 #43
Wow. ALMOST everything has been released.... and it's only been 50 years? Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #46
How do you know that 'nearly everything has been released'? sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #96
He proposes a conspiracy of silence Sanity Claws Nov 2013 #64
And that is the position of a vast majority of the American people, not to mention the rest of the sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #87
Expect the usual bullying snark from the Lone Nut Theorists villager Nov 2013 #3
It isn't a theory--it's a fact. n/t duffyduff Nov 2013 #10
...and of course, their patronizing pronouncements villager Nov 2013 #11
Believe what you want, you just sound silly. duffyduff Nov 2013 #14
as noted, only snark offered up villager Nov 2013 #16
You need to qualify statements like that. Anyone seeking credibility generally makes it sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #97
Like hell it is...Check out my last post. n/t whathehell Nov 2013 #23
How do you explain de Mohrenschildt's friendship with Oswald? JDPriestly Nov 2013 #34
"Friendship" is likely a relative term. HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #60
Nice conjecture. Possibly true. JDPriestly Nov 2013 #62
As someone who renounced his citizenship in the Soviet Union treestar Nov 2013 #76
The CIA wasn't the only agency interested in Oswald. HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #86
all those alphabet agencies watching him questionseverything Nov 2013 #99
Poppy's, too. Octafish Nov 2013 #92
LOL, make believe is more fun I realize. But get over it. It was alone nut. n-t Logical Nov 2013 #70
It's been investigated for 50 years treestar Nov 2013 #75
He doesn't even hide it. NCTraveler Nov 2013 #4
Yep. stopbush Nov 2013 #8
Yeah. That line kinda jumps out, eh?...nt SidDithers Nov 2013 #28
Yes, and he provides a valid reason for that position. Ace Acme Nov 2013 #39
How did he know Dulles would be on the commission before it was formed? Bolo Boffin Nov 2013 #48
Great analogy, absolutely correct - eom dreamnightwind Nov 2013 #50
Why would he hide it? Honest people do not hide things unless there is a very good reason. sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #90
An opinion isn't fact. Pierce is wrong. End of story. duffyduff Nov 2013 #9
He must really be losing sleep over that. villager Nov 2013 #13
LOL n/t whathehell Nov 2013 #24
I imagine his imagination keeps him up late anyway. n-t Logical Nov 2013 #71
In your imagination... he stays up late? villager Nov 2013 #94
your opinion has been duly noted. frylock Nov 2013 #31
oh..ok fascisthunter Nov 2013 #56
Someone on the internetz named "duffyduff" says it's the end of the story... ElboRuum Nov 2013 #61
I think he's talking about the government separating itself from accountability to the people. ancianita Nov 2013 #15
Some people have something to hide. LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #18
It's an excellent read! Recommend. KoKo Nov 2013 #19
Sometimes the correct answer to a question is "I don't know." That's where I'm at and you don't brewens Nov 2013 #21
"I think you kind of have to be predisposed one way or the other to settle on believing any set". whathehell Nov 2013 #25
Remember... DirtyDawg Nov 2013 #26
K & R !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #27
... SidDithers Nov 2013 #29
JFK wasn't your President. Major Hogwash Nov 2013 #33
It's a fucking Onion newspaper. Hilarious as hell. Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #37
It is a joke. Look it up. Logical Nov 2013 #72
everyone in Canada has the same access to information to have an opinion treestar Nov 2013 #88
Nice one. Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #38
Pierce is absolutely correct. meanit Nov 2013 #32
+ 1,000,000,000,000. n/t Peregrine Took Nov 2013 #52
There still might be people alive whose mistakes or bad judgment will become apparent. Ikonoklast Nov 2013 #54
exactly! fascisthunter Nov 2013 #55
Anyone who watches proReality Nov 2013 #35
"CTer" --> CTist. nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2013 #36
Maybe I'm too suspicious by nature... WorseBeforeBetter Nov 2013 #40
Not only was Oswald gunned down in a roomful of cops Art_from_Ark Nov 2013 #68
He was a groupie. A police groupie that is. From what I've read about him. calimary Nov 2013 #79
In those days you could take a gun onto a plane treestar Nov 2013 #89
That's what makes me suspicious, too MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #80
There are too many odd coincidences regarding the Kennedy Assassination for it not to be Uncle Joe Nov 2013 #41
The assignation of JFK was the genesis of the CT meme. zeemike Nov 2013 #42
it is easier to fool someone than it is to convince someone that they were fooled ... Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2013 #81
Yep....n/t necessary zeemike Nov 2013 #82
most important point in thread..... questionseverything Nov 2013 #100
Charles Pierce doesn't write about the evidence cpwm17 Nov 2013 #44
Even if what you claim is true dreamnightwind Nov 2013 #51
That Oswald and Oswald alone shot JFK is certain well beyond reasonable doubt. DanTex Nov 2013 #67
'The problem with articles like the one in the OP is that they abandon even the pretense of reason'' Octafish Nov 2013 #93
this pretty much sums it up for me questionseverything Nov 2013 #103
A dogmatic resistance to what can be known is just as destructive Bolo Boffin Nov 2013 #45
That's a wonderful post by Pierce. scarletwoman Nov 2013 #49
It is wonderful! n/t Peregrine Took Nov 2013 #53
K&R fascisthunter Nov 2013 #58
K&R johnnyreb Nov 2013 #59
CP Didn't Need to Get Specific colsohlibgal Nov 2013 #63
Indeed. Berlum Nov 2013 #65
I don't normally buy into much of the CT - TBF Nov 2013 #66
What's unfortunate is that people like Pierce simply don't want to look at any of the evidence. DanTex Nov 2013 #69
That just sounds like a general anti-government rant treestar Nov 2013 #73
Being skeptical about what your government tells you is a bad thing. Blind faith is. nm rhett o rick Nov 2013 #78
He's not just skeptical treestar Nov 2013 #84
I will agree that skepticism at extremes is as bad as blind faith. rhett o rick Nov 2013 #102
and here is the real reason for the rabid anti conspiracy stuff. TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #91
It may at times but this guy assumes treestar Nov 2013 #98
I'll rec NBachers Nov 2013 #83
When I was about 10, TheJames Nov 2013 #105
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I guess Charles Pierce no...»Reply #30