Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
30. Really?
Sat Dec 28, 2013, 03:45 AM
Dec 2013

Detail what part he's wrong about and how.

Nothing you just stated is in any manner a refutation of anything he asserted.

Never have heros liberal N proud Dec 2013 #1
Word !!! WillyT Dec 2013 #2
Clarke did work for George Bush. nt grasswire Dec 2013 #3
And Clinton Too... WillyT Dec 2013 #4
"I don’t know, but I don’t think anything that I’ve learned justifies the treasonous acts of neverforget Dec 2013 #5
Great Point... WillyT Dec 2013 #6
Errrrm except the panel had already made it's recommendations intaglio Dec 2013 #7
What "damage" exactly are you speaking of? LAGC Dec 2013 #11
Evidently noise Dec 2013 #14
ever heard the phrase "two wrongs don't make a right"? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #55
He could have exposed NSA . . . brush Dec 2013 #64
Not everyone wants to spend their life in prison. roody Dec 2013 #123
He exposed the DAMAGE BEING DONE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #17
This panel was put into place after Snowden neverforget Dec 2013 #22
The Panel was not empowered to consider its own creation bobduca Dec 2013 #33
under the bus you go, Richard Clark! Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #8
He's wrong, which is no reason to diminish all the times he was right, but he's wrong this time. sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #18
No, he's really not wrong. gcomeau Dec 2013 #26
Clarke IS wrong. He tried it YOUR way and got nowhere. Nothing changed. Snowden's way is working sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #29
Really? gcomeau Dec 2013 #30
Clarke's own record is a refutation of what YOU asserted. Clarke KNEW the Bush sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #38
No, it really isn't. gcomeau Dec 2013 #48
Post something to back this up please: sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #50
Oh let's see...China AND Russia.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #57
So The Guardian and Der Spiegel and the NYT are 'foreign governments'? Iow Snowden did NOT sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #62
YOU think their govts are not spying on THEM? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #63
Well, if the Russians had an opportunity to spy on Snowden, the only people to blame for that is the sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #65
OH PULEEZE! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #71
OH PULEEZE! You cannot possibly be so in love with Bush's Appointees in the NSA, Clapper who lied to sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #95
see prime example VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #107
Sure, if I saw two wrongs. I see ONE egregious wrong, which I saw way back when it began. sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #125
I'll wait... gcomeau Dec 2013 #70
You will be waiting... zappaman Dec 2013 #87
Well, I suppose some enjoy the taste of foot... -eom gcomeau Dec 2013 #88
This message was self-deleted by its author VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #108
Foot in mouth = permanent fixture Bobbie Jo Dec 2013 #97
One wonders how many feet can actually fit in a mouth? zappaman Dec 2013 #104
Holy Hell. That is absolutely astonishing, even for Snowden Number23 Dec 2013 #111
I think you are the one whose foot is in the wrong place. sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #126
Wow... all that writing gcomeau Dec 2013 #128
Snowden is revealing the corruption of a Private Corporation, Booz Allen in this case. I hope that sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #129
Are you physically capable of staying on topic? gcomeau Dec 2013 #130
Here, let me make it simple for you. Allegiance to corrupt, multi-billion dollar Corporations is not sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #131
Or in summary... gcomeau Dec 2013 #132
'Yawn'! sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #133
Sigh gcomeau Dec 2013 #134
You got a little off topic didn't you? sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #135
I refer you to post 26. gcomeau Dec 2013 #138
He leaked it to EVERYONE gcomeau Dec 2013 #68
Good for him for exposing corruption in our government. He did the right thing, he leaked it to the sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #83
Try to get a handle on the difference... gcomeau Dec 2013 #85
Try to get a handle on just how important our Constitutional Rights are to the American people. It's sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #86
You didn't even read what I said did you? -eom gcomeau Dec 2013 #89
she has fingers in ears going la..la..la..la.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #109
There it is again, that old Bush Supporter talking point about Liberals. I had so much sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #140
I'm a Bush supporter? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #141
I didn't say you were. I said you were using Right Wing attacks on Liberals which were as stupid sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #143
No actually you did....You think ANYONE who doesn't support Snowden is... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #144
+1 zappaman Dec 2013 #145
Lol, I could have bet on that response and won. Snowden IS a hero, like it or not. sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #148
No he didn't VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #56
+1000 dionysus Dec 2013 #146
Clarke is EXACTLY right. My respect for him has risen. nt DevonRex Dec 2013 #9
+100 nt okaawhatever Dec 2013 #10
Yep. politichew Dec 2013 #12
Clarke is full of shit noise Dec 2013 #13
There was a review and there will be reform. politichew Dec 2013 #15
Of course it matters how we got there noise Dec 2013 #16
How ridiculous. sibelian Dec 2013 #24
That statement was ridiculous. -eom gcomeau Dec 2013 #27
"How we got there should not matter" especially when you are rewriting history bobduca Dec 2013 #34
He is full of shit on this. I wish he had done what Snowden had the guts to do instead of sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #51
Clarke couldn't be more wrong and his acceptance to be on the panel convened BECAUSE of the sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #19
run... quick, that ball is on it's way... reach! fascisthunter Dec 2013 #61
LOL, so predictable! n-t Logical Dec 2013 #98
You've stooped to replying to posts 10 days old to be rude? Predictable as well. DevonRex Dec 2013 #117
From the ProSense Dec 2013 #20
Exactly, ProSense and thank you Cha Dec 2013 #25
"calling out the propaganda" bobduca Dec 2013 #35
Brecht had it right: Ken Burch Dec 2013 #21
No douchebag.. sendero Dec 2013 #23
Is this the same Richard Clarke who wrote this? Pholus Dec 2013 #28
It always astounds me... gcomeau Dec 2013 #31
The entire summer has been an attempt to say if Snowden is not Pholus Dec 2013 #32
Enjoy your imaginary argument... gcomeau Dec 2013 #47
That whooshing noise wasn't Starship Captain Alexander's expensive door.... Pholus Dec 2013 #54
Yeah that only works... gcomeau Dec 2013 #66
You calling the point invalid Pholus Dec 2013 #74
As pointed out elsewhere in the thread... gcomeau Dec 2013 #77
It's annoying when a fact is ignored, isn't it. Pholus Dec 2013 #92
Yes... it is. gcomeau Dec 2013 #96
50% relevant isn't bad for you. Pholus Dec 2013 #100
They were both relevent. Try reading more carefully. gcomeau Dec 2013 #102
Clarke flip-flopped. Pholus Dec 2013 #105
No. he. did. not. gcomeau Dec 2013 #110
Ahhh, the sound of little flip-flops in the night. Pholus Dec 2013 #118
And he still is concerned. gcomeau Dec 2013 #120
:) Wow, I see why the apologists use this style of argument. Pholus Dec 2013 #121
This! ^^^ brush Dec 2013 #67
he is right, Willy scheming daemons Dec 2013 #36
Same could be said for this guy ... dawg Dec 2013 #37
Eddie is not leading any armies treestar Dec 2013 #42
Comparing him to George Washington now? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #59
Washinton was much more of a traitor. dawg Dec 2013 #72
and sometimes a traitor is just a traitor... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #75
This time, it just needed to have the whistle blown, dawg Dec 2013 #78
You don't get to decide what constitutes committing acts against your government VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #79
Actually yes I do get to decide that. dawg Dec 2013 #80
actually is called "the law" I suggest you study up on it... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #84
And yet you would probably be angry if... dawg Dec 2013 #94
No I am not...I am displaying respect for the law of the land... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #101
You ever read the Constitution? bobclark86 Dec 2013 #39
It always amazes me how many people who throw around the word "treason" ... BlueCheese Dec 2013 #41
You noticed that too, huh? n/t bobclark86 Dec 2013 #43
I should emphasize that in this case I'm referring primarily to Clarke. BlueCheese Dec 2013 #46
On the other hand Reagan, George H.W. Bush & Junior Bush all seem to have committed acts that fit dflprincess Dec 2013 #52
Try sedition . . . brush Dec 2013 #69
Sedition is "Seditious Conspiracy" bobclark86 Dec 2013 #90
He hasn't been "charged" with either but it's actually a little bit of both brush Dec 2013 #113
There's not a "little bit of both" bobclark86 Dec 2013 #114
Are you aware he's not in custody? brush Dec 2013 #115
Arrested and charged aren't the same thing... bobclark86 Dec 2013 #116
The link said some charges were sealed . . . brush Dec 2013 #122
Yes, it does... Tikki Dec 2013 #49
Does Clarke really believe that there was a snowball's chance... BlueCheese Dec 2013 #40
Funny no one cared about it when Risen revealed it treestar Dec 2013 #44
Clarke is wrong on this PowerToThePeople Dec 2013 #45
White washing has been perfected to the point that Lint Head Dec 2013 #53
Albert Einstein said: A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of the truth. mitty14u2 Dec 2013 #58
do 2 wrongs make a right? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #60
No. But maybe three will. Civics 101 says sometimes laws have to be broken to change things. Lint Head Dec 2013 #73
this is hardly "breaking a few laws" like speeding or smoking a joint my friend. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #76
Who are you quoting? I didn't say "breaking a few laws". Any law, no matter how extreme, can be Lint Head Dec 2013 #91
Yes it can...but we have methods to change them. Unlike a real "tyranny" VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #103
Is someone on DU banding about tyranny? Lint Head Dec 2013 #106
Yes they were.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2013 #112
Clarke's right of course. gulliver Dec 2013 #81
Make You A Deal... WillyT Dec 2013 #82
Why don't we suspend all criminal prosecutions until Bush is tried? hack89 Dec 2013 #93
I think you believe you made a joke, bobduca Dec 2013 #136
Just agreeing with WillyT. Nt hack89 Dec 2013 #137
Got it thanks for clarification & edit bobduca Dec 2013 #139
LOL, another person scared by the NSA. Perfect. Gullible much? n-t Logical Dec 2013 #99
I agree! B Calm Dec 2013 #142
clarke confirms what i felt. and i have always respected and trusted clarke, so seabeyond Dec 2013 #119
Wow! What a mud-pit this turned into! JNelson6563 Dec 2013 #124
Who on earth thought Richard Clarke would side with Snowden? Rex Dec 2013 #127
Richard Clarke isn't a hero or even close. 99Forever Dec 2013 #147
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fuck... Another Hero Down...»Reply #30