Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: After 20 Years, NAFTA Leaves Mexico’s Economy in Ruins [View all]octoberlib
(14,971 posts)15. Excellent interview with Lori Wallach
Joshua Holland: What about Canada and Mexico? I know Mexicos agricultural labor market was devastated by NAFTA, as subsidized corn and other products flooded into the country, and it certainly spurred a huge wave of immigration from the south, as all those agricultural workers lost their jobs. But in terms of employment in other sectors, did it end up a net winner or loser for them?
Lori Wallach : Also, if you look at Mexico, the level of poverty has stayed the same, but income inequality has increased, and industrial wages are actually down in real terms.
One statistic that really shows the failure of the free trade model is that the price paid to Mexicos farmers for their corn dropped 80 percent within the first three years of NAFTA, as a huge flood of subsidized US corn started flowing in. But the price Mexicans pay for tortillasa staple foodhas increased almost 300 percent. Under free trade theory, some folks lose those corn farmers lose but everyone is supposed to get richer because prices go down. That is the theory of free trade the consumer benefits, and the producer who loses should be compensated and the tortilla shows how that promise has been proven false.
There are many reasons for this. NAFTA wasnt just about trade. It set up all these rules that, for instance, allowed Archer Daniels to buy up not only the processing plants for corn, but also to buy a stake in one of the biggest tortilla makers, Bimbo, which is sort of the Wonder Bread of Mexico. And as a result, you have Archer Daniels and other companies selling to themselves, and marking up the profit margin each time. So with this competition that free trade is supposed to create, with all these corporate rights to acquire and basically monopolize sectors, the consumer is the loser.
http://billmoyers.com/2014/01/09/fool-me-once-20-years-of-nafta-show-why-the-trans-pacific-partnership-must-be-stopped/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Proponents always say nice things about terrible ideas...and those that author them.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jan 2014
#11
And NAFTA / Clinton were one reason we lost a lot of blue collar votes in places like rural Virginia
X_Digger
Jan 2014
#3
China produces 4 times the steel we did even when we were number one in the world. From
doc03
Jan 2014
#25
"working harder" = No. Investing in new plant & equipment. But part of that is foreign capital
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#26
NAFTA and welfare reform is why I stopped being a registered Democrat...
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#16