Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
172. So are US CO2 emmisions since the late 1840's
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 05:19 PM
Jan 2014

when global warming was first predicted. Not much notice is taken of that either.

Ah c'mon Octafish. Cleita Jan 2014 #1
Thanks, Cleita. That's why I posted. Few who know are talking about Fukushima in public. Octafish Jan 2014 #3
Maybe when people start discovering they have polluted a whole food supply chain, they will Cleita Jan 2014 #6
I feel the same, Cleita! countryjake Jan 2014 #15
It was brought up on the Stephanie Miller radio show... Rockyj Jan 2014 #24
Why would the media lie? Octafish Jan 2014 #96
Stephanie Miller isn't all that smart. She means well, but she's not one to go to for info. cui bono Jan 2014 #97
we don't know what to do questionseverything Jan 2014 #60
More On Fukushima Unit 3, TEPCO Fails To Explain Levels Octafish Jan 2014 #134
Starfish dying in the NW Pacific antiquie Jan 2014 #2
No, plutonium isn't killing the starfish. Vashta Nerada Jan 2014 #5
Ok then ...we won't worry about it. Thanks. L0oniX Jan 2014 #27
On this you should not nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #39
Oh ...my auto sarc tag isn't working again. My bad. L0oniX Jan 2014 #42
Thank you for pointing that out, antiquie. We need more information. Octafish Jan 2014 #7
I worry about my grandkids. antiquie Jan 2014 #8
That's the kicker, isn't it? Whisp Jan 2014 #30
We can protect our kids from this RobertEarl Jan 2014 #32
They'll still be human when they grow up Shivering Jemmy Jan 2014 #226
Yes, in the case of star fish yes they do nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #48
absolutely! Me too. n/t wildbilln864 Jan 2014 #138
See 39 please nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #40
Die off started before the reactor blew up. jeff47 Jan 2014 #21
Yep. Plutonium has been there awhile. RobertEarl Jan 2014 #25
So....never took a biology class, huh? jeff47 Jan 2014 #26
"there is no telling what may happen" NuclearDem Jan 2014 #29
Not like this. antiquie Jan 2014 #36
Yes, like this. In fact, it is literally this die off. jeff47 Jan 2014 #38
That has zero to do with fukushima nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #34
Plutonium G_j Jan 2014 #4
1 Millionth of One Gram of Inhaled Plutonium Will Give You Cancer -- Helen Caldicott, MD Octafish Jan 2014 #9
thank you G_j Jan 2014 #14
G_j, have you heard about this? countryjake Jan 2014 #18
yes, but I haven't seen this latest update G_j Jan 2014 #28
Corporate media and government silence on Fuku is deafening. JEB Jan 2014 #10
Thanks for the heads-up, JEB. Don't have a replacement for the original, yet. Octafish Jan 2014 #55
our granddaughter wanted to spend this summer in Japan... that was nixed in a heartbeat secondwind Jan 2014 #11
That's very good flamingdem Jan 2014 #12
Do you remember the special trip Hillary made to Japan after Fukushima? flamingdem Jan 2014 #13
So you are claiming the Obama administration is complicit? Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #63
It's more of a tendency rather than a blatant policy flamingdem Jan 2014 #74
They've done it for banksters and corporations. n/t cui bono Jan 2014 #98
Orders. Word from above... Octafish Jan 2014 #133
No. Agschmid Jan 2014 #205
Oh, BULLSHIT! ChisolmTrailDem Jan 2014 #16
Yeah, go shopping. JEB Jan 2014 #17
You first, (in the hug your plutonium for real department with no shielding) nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #35
You do realize I was being facetious, right? nt ChisolmTrailDem Jan 2014 #37
When it comes to this subject my sarcasm-o-meter is non functional nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #41
Bananas! 1000words Jan 2014 #50
Phew, not the only one who noticed that meme nadinbrzezinski Jan 2014 #59
LOL! Plutonium is good business. Octafish Jan 2014 #67
Wrong. AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #19
Natural plutonium is extremely rare. Rex Jan 2014 #20
But if it were natural, then it would be healthy and good Orrex Jan 2014 #197
I tried to buy some from GNC and they called the cops! Rex Jan 2014 #219
I've wondered if there could be a link between southerncrone Jan 2014 #101
That may be so, but the fuel in Reactor 3 is enriched with plutonium. Octafish Jan 2014 #104
I wouldn't trust TEPCO to tell us the truth no matter what. Rex Jan 2014 #122
Something like 80% of the mass of the core of the reactor at Chernobyl AtheistCrusader Jan 2014 #131
It is extremely embarrassing RobertEarl Jan 2014 #22
Nuclear Information and Resource Service Octafish Jan 2014 #222
100th rec RobertEarl Jan 2014 #225
Don't worry, there's an app for that MyNameGoesHere Jan 2014 #23
Didn't they take that one off the market? Octafish Jan 2014 #70
wow, that's uhhhh flamingdem Jan 2014 #75
Not this again, Jesus! nt Logical Jan 2014 #31
Fukushima is all over the news? Octafish Jan 2014 #92
Nope. lonestarnot Jan 2014 #117
One would think, just based on the SCALE of the disaster, it'd be on TV. Octafish Jan 2014 #119
They must not like the smell of plutonium and stapelia gigantea. Sucks the breath right out of them lonestarnot Jan 2014 #147
EDIT: Original line here contained statistics I pulled out of my ass. It was wrong, and I apologize. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #33
But it's going to annihilate all life in the Northern hemisphere!!!!!!!!! jeff47 Jan 2014 #43
That is the stupidest thing I've read all day! Just how the fuck can you say that? You have ChisolmTrailDem Jan 2014 #44
thank you G_j Jan 2014 #45
"You fuckers"? zappaman Jan 2014 #47
And all the other side has is a bunch of hyperbolic faulty reasoning. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #51
the comment G_j Jan 2014 #53
And the jury results are.... aikoaiko Jan 2014 #88
Looks like the post was edited after the alert was sent...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #109
Where did I mention starfish? Octafish Jan 2014 #49
Didn't say you did. But I know RobertEarl's OP probably triggered this OP. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #52
No. Plutonium is the trigger RobertEarl Jan 2014 #54
You're unbelievable. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #57
So, you brought it up to conflate the issues. Octafish Jan 2014 #56
Ah, Christ. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #58
"Octafish, is there anyone who disagrees with you that isn't a COINTELPRO operative? "... SidDithers Jan 2014 #61
Tag team is so profound, SidDithers. Octafish Jan 2014 #65
The BFEE are killing starfish!!...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #66
Ha ha. It is to laugh at Fascism. Octafish Jan 2014 #68
If you want honest discussion, don't attribute to me what I didn't write then. Octafish Jan 2014 #62
You really don't understand any of this, do you? RobertEarl Jan 2014 #64
"International problem" is pretty far from "global catastrophe." NuclearDem Jan 2014 #72
International problem is global. RobertEarl Jan 2014 #73
For the record, I enjoyed the DU Mail back and forth just a few minutes ago. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #76
And? RobertEarl Jan 2014 #77
You have GOT to be joking. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #79
You caught me RobertEarl Jan 2014 #80
You mean like the half a nano sievert increase in radiation over BC? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #81
See that>>> ""increase in radiation"" RobertEarl Jan 2014 #83
You know what a nano sievert is right? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #85
Concentrated RobertEarl Jan 2014 #86
Mercury contamination in fish RobertEarl Jan 2014 #87
Seriously, enough plutonium to completely contaminate the food supply? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #89
There were many tons of plutonium RobertEarl Jan 2014 #90
Again, at levels far, far below levels that would cause even minor health risks. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #91
Again RobertEarl Jan 2014 #93
Where the hell are you getting that 4.194 pCi/kg figure? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #95
It is found in this DoE report RobertEarl Jan 2014 #120
Granted those figures are in that study... NuclearDem Jan 2014 #126
Point is RobertEarl Jan 2014 #127
No. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #128
Like I say RobertEarl Jan 2014 #129
So you've got nothing else then? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #130
huh? questionseverything Jan 2014 #135
I never said that wasn't true. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #136
p239 is an isotope and lasts about 2 years questionseverything Jan 2014 #139
I think you're confusing Pu-239 with Cs-134 NuclearDem Jan 2014 #141
yes i did questionseverything Jan 2014 #143
Except that study indicated the plutonium, americium, and uranium levels corroborated with pre-2000 NuclearDem Jan 2014 #144
my theory is not either or questionseverything Jan 2014 #145
it si the nonuniform distribution in particulate form questionseverything Jan 2014 #146
Yes, questionseverything RobertEarl Jan 2014 #140
links? nt G_j Jan 2014 #71
And dismissing real concerns is being very disingenuous to the people suffering. Rex Jan 2014 #123
The word "catastrophe" may not mean what you think it means cthulu2016 Jan 2014 #46
You are so right. The lights are still on. Octafish Jan 2014 #69
What do you think it means for the Japanese? Rex Jan 2014 #124
As a child in the 1950s, I got lots of propaganda about the "promise of the peaceful atom." LongTomH Jan 2014 #78
Better Dead than Red. Octafish Jan 2014 #84
How could it not be? Whisp Jan 2014 #82
It's a disaster on a planetary scale and yet Corporate Media pretend it isn't. Octafish Jan 2014 #94
What exactly do you think it's going to do? Sirveri Jan 2014 #102
I try not to dwell on this because, frankly, there's Jack Shit that I can do about it. Electric Monk Jan 2014 #99
I feel that way too, Electric Monk. Problem is, TEPCO also feels that way, too. Octafish Jan 2014 #107
Because Justin Beiber's antics are more important southerncrone Jan 2014 #100
No one died when Justin Bieber got drunk -- but they could have. Octafish Jan 2014 #106
same with the who questionseverything Jan 2014 #137
Here's a report on plutonium from Fukushima: only detectable very close to the reactor muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #103
Here's a report where plutonium was found 40 km from the plant. Octafish Jan 2014 #105
this part shows how ununiform movement can be questionseverything Jan 2014 #121
Thank you - TBF Jan 2014 #108
It is impossible for it to impact weather patterns hack89 Jan 2014 #110
Ionizing Radiation - TBF Jan 2014 #113
Your links saying nothing about changing weather patterns hack89 Jan 2014 #115
Still reading - I found one USA Today TBF Jan 2014 #118
Krypton Gas effecting weather? RobertEarl Jan 2014 #125
Thank you! It's an older article but that's probably better - TBF Jan 2014 #132
You are most welcome, TBF. Octafish Jan 2014 #112
Very helpful - TBF Jan 2014 #114
K&R DeSwiss Jan 2014 #111
LOLOLOLOL! Thanks, DeSwiss. ...except for the Aerosolized Plutonium... Octafish Jan 2014 #116
well, I'll not argue... FreeJoe Jan 2014 #142
How Dangerous Is 400-6000 Pounds Of Plutonium Nano Particle Dust Liberated By Fukushima? Octafish Jan 2014 #148
Wow, first of all, that's a hell of a range (400-6000). NuclearDem Jan 2014 #149
I'll side with Helen Caldicott. Octafish Jan 2014 #150
What does Helen Caldicott's position on transparency have to do with the validity of her claims? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #151
Diversion, misattribution, strawmen and ad hominem attack. Octafish Jan 2014 #152
Yep, most of those were in your post. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #153
Now you are projecting. Octafish Jan 2014 #154
Projecting? You can't be serious. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #155
Perfectly serious. That's why the OP. Octafish Jan 2014 #156
Written entirely without any sort of awareness. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #158
No. Caldicott made a mistake, based on what was then known. A lot different than what you call her. Octafish Jan 2014 #159
No, she took a study that fit her preconceptions despite its numerous known flaws NuclearDem Jan 2014 #161
Again, TEPCO lies. Octafish Jan 2014 #164
Did I ever say TEPCO can be trusted? At all? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #165
Thank you for bringing some rationality to this issue. zappaman Jan 2014 #157
So, you've nothing to write about plutonium from Fukushima, zappaman. Octafish Jan 2014 #160
Nope. zappaman Jan 2014 #162
OK. I'd rather be called Brad, than Dude. Octafish Jan 2014 #167
Whatever... zappaman Jan 2014 #168
Why sources matter, from a journalist at Project Censored... Octafish Jan 2014 #170
Release of plutonium isotopes from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident SidDithers Jan 2014 #163
As opposed to this? Octafish Jan 2014 #166
As everything you've republished has links to originals dipsydoodle Jan 2014 #169
It may have to do with clouding the central issue: Fukushima is a global catastrophe. Octafish Jan 2014 #171
So are US CO2 emmisions since the late 1840's dipsydoodle Jan 2014 #172
Carl Sagan and Helen Caldicott... Octafish Jan 2014 #174
You continually claim the plutonium from Fukushima is a 'global catastrophe' without any evidence muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #173
The OP and most of my replies are sourced. Octafish Jan 2014 #175
I gave you science from sources independent of TEPCO, or governments, in #103 muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #176
Great. And I gave you sources in #105 that showed where it was found 25 miles away from FNPP. Octafish Jan 2014 #177
Thank you. Now I see where you're coming from. Octafish Jan 2014 #178
And 25 miles is not 'global' (nt) muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #180
Right. But it's plutonium and found 25 times further from the plant than you reported in #103. Octafish Jan 2014 #181
No; the paper found some at 16km away too. But it's patchy muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #182
I'd rather people get the facts and use them to set policy. The phrase is democracy. Octafish Jan 2014 #184
was this supposed to be "safe" too? questionseverything Jan 2014 #187
Globalresearch.ca. LOL... SidDithers Jan 2014 #195
For the cost of Iraq War, we could've built National 100% Renewable Clean Energy Grid. Octafish Jan 2014 #224
... longship Jan 2014 #179
Exactly... SidDithers Jan 2014 #183
Don't worry. The situation may even be worse than what's posted on this thread. Octafish Jan 2014 #188
3-5 orders of magnitude less bad than Chernobyl... SidDithers Jan 2014 #189
But Helen Caldicott said Chernobyl killed nearly a million people! NuclearDem Jan 2014 #191
''3-5 orders of magnitude less than Chernobyl.'' Octafish Jan 2014 #192
Oh for crying out loud. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #198
I want you on the record about this..... Logical Jan 2014 #190
Where did I write that, Logical? Octafish Jan 2014 #193
You claim this is a real true crisis! Where is the coverage??? nt Logical Jan 2014 #196
Oh, I see. If it's not on tee vee, it's not real. Octafish Jan 2014 #204
Where is it? Why was Chernobyl on the tee vee? Or TMI??????? nt Logical Jan 2014 #208
Unfortunately, the facts say otherwise: Plutonium from Fukushima is a global catastrophe. Octafish Jan 2014 #185
ARRRRRGH!!!! longship Jan 2014 #186
They found Fukushima shit in NM? RobertEarl Jan 2014 #194
Same report said it was of no environmental concern. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #199
What is it with you? Any amount of plutonium is cause for concern. Octafish Jan 2014 #202
Alright, so you didn't read the report then. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #206
I read the article where the scientist from NMSU said they detected plutonium on March 14, 2011. Octafish Jan 2014 #207
No, that's not what he said. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #211
do you back the use of depleted uranium in weapons too? questionseverything Jan 2014 #209
Oh, there's a straw man if I ever saw it. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #212
i was just pointing out questionseverything Jan 2014 #213
What bearing does that have on this? NuclearDem Jan 2014 #214
you have been telling me for days how safe things are questionseverything Jan 2014 #215
There's a big difference between depleted uranium and the nearly-undetectable cesium in tuna. NuclearDem Jan 2014 #216
Sure they did. longship Jan 2014 #200
No wonder all you got is ridicule. Octafish Jan 2014 #201
The article itself.......... NM_Birder Jan 2014 #210
Doesn't the US military use plutonium missiles ... MindMover Jan 2014 #203
May explain the birth defects... Octafish Jan 2014 #217
Yes, plutonium is bad. Any amount in your lungs causes cancer but... ryan_cats Jan 2014 #218
An Admirable Ability. Here's what Physicians for Social Responsibility said back in March, 2011... Octafish Jan 2014 #223
I saw about a three minute report last night. lonestarnot Jan 2014 #220
Did they ask: 'What if the Fukushima nuclear fallout crisis had happened here?' Octafish Jan 2014 #221
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Plutonium from Fukushima ...»Reply #172