Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

4. Christie's response is a clue that it's more.

Reply to jberryhill (Original post)

Fri Jan 31, 2014, 09:55 PM

Jan 2014

He completely contradicted his previous ever-changing lies by claiming that the letter confirmed what he said.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024423267

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What "there is evidence" means to a lawyer [View all] jberryhill Jan 2014 OP

Thanks for the clarification, berryhill. elleng Jan 2014 #1

I'm betting that Wildstein has more 'evidence' and even some that will turn out to be a smoking gun Tx4obama Jan 2014 #2

Evidence is only relevant if it makes the truth of the matter asserted more likely Gothmog Jan 2014 #3

Evidence "tying Christie to having knowledge" jberryhill Jan 2014 #5

Maybe they have Christie's transcript from Faber College cthulu2016 Jan 2014 #10

But it was double secret probation. jberryhill Jan 2014 #13

Christie's response is a clue that it's more. ProSense Jan 2014 #4

Stock response jberryhill Jan 2014 #7

True, but ProSense Jan 2014 #8

Oh I did not mean to suggest it is "inconceivable" jberryhill Jan 2014 #11

What's important is that Christie's political future has been further damaged. onehandle Jan 2014 #6

Yes, he doesn't assert that this evidence is not already known cthulu2016 Jan 2014 #9

Indeed jberryhill Jan 2014 #12

I am watching Hardball Gothmog Feb 2014 #14

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What "there is evide...»Reply #4