Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the World Bank has no...»Reply #13
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Why the World Bank has no real intentions of reducing poverty [View all]

pampango

(24,692 posts)
13. If HW said it, that's good enough for me. The Birchers must have been right.
Reply to Zalatix (Reply #12)
Thu Mar 22, 2012, 03:57 PM
Mar 2012

Or did HW slip up and let the secret out?

TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why the World Bank has no real intentions of reducing poverty [View all] G_j Mar 2012 OP
i think we should be sceptical of all our institutions whose purpose is said to be xchrom Mar 2012 #1
If you look at the governments in Latin America who really have reduced poverty EFerrari Mar 2012 #4
+1 xchrom Mar 2012 #5
this. KG Mar 2012 #8
yes G_j Mar 2012 #18
When in the history of the world has any bank cared about reducing povery? The bottom line has demosincebirth Mar 2012 #2
When FDR started the World Bank (and GATT and the IMF) at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944. pampango Mar 2012 #3
Corrupt and want to protect Corporations lovuian Mar 2012 #6
This New World Order? pampango Mar 2012 #7
Another heavily debunked conspiracy theory from the Birchers Zalatix Mar 2012 #12
If HW said it, that's good enough for me. The Birchers must have been right. pampango Mar 2012 #13
My point is that the New World Order problem is not invalidated just because Birchers pointed it out Zalatix Mar 2012 #14
It wasn't just the Birchers. "The militantly anti-government right, and secondarily fundamentalist pampango Mar 2012 #15
Yeah, the NWO hardly has to be secretive. Zalatix Mar 2012 #16
Population control Zalatix Mar 2012 #11
rec. KG Mar 2012 #9
If the numbers don't fit just change the numbers. raouldukelives Mar 2012 #10
I was friends with the President's daughter in college Dragonbreathp9d Mar 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the World Bank has no...»Reply #13
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.