Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are You Tired of Being the World's Policeman? [View all]okaawhatever
(9,545 posts)8. The common mistake I think we all make is assuming if we weren't the "world's policeman" that the
world would be the same or better. How do we know that? If we didn't patrol the shipping lanes and keep commerce going who would? Would the results be the same? If we didn't have agreements in place to protect smaller countries, or treaties like NATO would everyone spend more money on arms and the military? If so, would they use them?
It's easy to say that things would be better if we weren't the world's policeman but we have to give a serious thought to who would take that role and how it would turn out.
Perhaps we should ask the question, "Who should be the world's police and what would that look like? How could we make it better?"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
One can be sure some in the MIC are cranking the numbers on profitability scenarios! n/t
RKP5637
Mar 2014
#5
Seeing as how our "protection" of countries is like the Mafia's "protection" of businesses...
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#6
The common mistake I think we all make is assuming if we weren't the "world's policeman" that the
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#8
The 'we' would be the same people as the 'our' referred to, in your own OP
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2014
#11
Well, the "we" is the United States. If you mean who is the "we" in terms of individual members
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#12
What was the purpose of Vietnam where we lost over 50,000 lives and they fought back
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#34
I'm not saying there is a valid justification for Vietnam or Iraq, but your assumption that none of
okaawhatever
Mar 2014
#38
Interesting that this is the focus of some during Russias unprovoked war of aggression.
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#15
That line of reasoning does not work with individual citizens. I am not the government or the Bush
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#27
99% of the time that is what starts wars, protecting nations' business interests.
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2014
#23
as long as we spend more on the military than the most of the rest of the world combined
usa liberal
Mar 2014
#25