Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: More evidence an innocent man was executed [View all]Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)23. The former governor of Illinois, George Ryan put a moratorium on the death penalty
In Illinois in 1999, after 14 men on death row were found to be innocent. He said, "I still believe the death penalty is a proper response to heinous crimes... But I believe that it has to be where we don't put innocent people to death."
Pope John Paul II, in his encyclical Evangelium Vitae -- "The Gospel of Life". After a discussion of self defense, he says
This is the context in which to place the problem of the death penalty. On this matter there is a growing tendency, both in the Church and in civil society, to demand that it be applied in a very limited way or even that it be abolished completely. The problem must be viewed in the context of a system of penal justice ever more in line with human dignity and thus, in the end, with God's plan for man and society. The primary purpose of the punishment which society inflicts is "to redress the disorder caused by the offence." Public authority must redress the violation of personal and social rights by imposing on the offender an adequate punishment for the crime, as a condition for the offender to regain the exercise of his or her freedom. In this way authority also fulfills the purpose of defending public order and ensuring people's safety, while at the same time offering the offender an incentive and help to change his or her behaviour and be rehabilitated.
It is clear that, for these purposes to be achieved, the nature and extent of the punishment must be carefully evaluated and decided upon, and ought not go to the extreme of executing the offender except in cases of absolute necessity: in other words, when it would not be possible otherwise to defend society. Today however, as a result of steady improvements in the organization of the penal system, such cases are very rare, if not practically non-existent.
In any event, the principle set forth in the new Catechism of the Catholic Church remains valid: 'If bloodless means are sufficient to defend human lives against an aggressor and to protect public order and the safety of persons, public authority must limit itself to such means, because they better correspond to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in conformity to the dignity of the human person.'
To sum this up, capital punishment is not intrinsically immoral, but there are essentially no situations in which it is morally acceptable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The former governor of Illinois, George Ryan put a moratorium on the death penalty
Fortinbras Armstrong
Mar 2014
#23
The Prosecutors should be charged with murder if they lied about the jailhouse deal. nt
Fantastic Anarchist
Mar 2014
#25
I remember that case and airc there was enough evidence even back then to stop that
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#29
If prosecutors/judges etc can be shown to have knowingly executed an innocent man
yodermon
Mar 2014
#40