Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 01:53 PM Mar 2014

Was the U.S. Invading Iraq and Russia invading Crimea morally equivalent? [View all]


10 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
No, the Russian invasion of Crimea is worse.
1 (10%)
No, the U.S. invasion of Iraq was worse
4 (40%)
Both invasions were and are morally reprehensible. There is little or no point in arguing which one is worse.
5 (50%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I suppose it depends on the criteria one uses to arrive at a judgment cali Mar 2014 #1
Of course one statred ~10 years ago, the other ... about a month ago. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #5
Did it start a month ago? I bet the Tartars would say the Russian expansion into Crimea Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #12
This particular episode. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #17
true enough, but I do think the comparison is not only fair- but inevitable. cali Mar 2014 #15
Difficult. Both were clearly acts by corrupt regimes. But as Cali said, Iraq was far, far worse. nt onehandle Mar 2014 #2
The invasion of Iraq was worse. But thats not what the President was saying yesterday. phleshdef Mar 2014 #3
Yea but ... JoePhilly Mar 2014 #7
Both were in violation of international law, but one of them led to a Hell of a lot more ... 11 Bravo Mar 2014 #4
So far. JoePhilly Mar 2014 #6
Aren't you using your DU Crystal Ball, distributed to all good members of DU? el_bryanto Mar 2014 #34
collateral damage Supersedeas Mar 2014 #8
The hundreds of thousands dead make the Iraq invastion much worse LittleBlue Mar 2014 #9
I think Iraq was not only worse but much, much worse. PeteSelman Mar 2014 #10
They already did that in 1944, removed a couple of hundred thousand Tatars by force Bluenorthwest Mar 2014 #13
That was 70 years ago. PeteSelman Mar 2014 #16
That transhistorical Russia, damn the bear! JackRiddler Mar 2014 #21
Both were morally wrong. The only noticeable difference: Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #11
the right to speak out is important--how you speak out counts as well Supersedeas Mar 2014 #14
Depends what one assumes the US knew One_Life_To_Give Mar 2014 #18
Even if they did sincerely think Iraq had some WMD's, did they seriously think Iraq was a threat to Douglas Carpenter Mar 2014 #19
Eventually not enforcing rules has their own consequences One_Life_To_Give Mar 2014 #31
The US bloody well knew... JackRiddler Mar 2014 #22
I remember the run up to the Iraq invasion very clearly Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #24
To use a legal term, what President Obama did was to distinguish the Iraq war from Crimea Gothmog Mar 2014 #20
Unless I missed Russia's "shock and awe" offensive, the answer is pretty clear. n/t Skip Intro Mar 2014 #23
Is blaming Obama for the Iraq invation morally equivalent to blaming Obama for the Crimea invation? baldguy Mar 2014 #25
No, blaming Obama for Iraq would be worse cthulu2016 Mar 2014 #26
If it rains a bit, Obama gets blamed for a flood. baldguy Mar 2014 #27
I see the objective as pointing out Obama said something morningfog Mar 2014 #33
I'm sorry-- the invasion of Iraq was an international crime against humanity.... mike_c Mar 2014 #28
I would have to say Panama Separation Mar 2014 #29
Agreed OmahaBlueDog Mar 2014 #30
The Suez Crisis also comes to mind. JVS Mar 2014 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was the U.S. Invading Ira...