General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is this blog post intolerant of the transgendered? [View all]BainsBane
(53,012 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 14, 2014, 12:21 AM - Edit history (1)
Of occasions on which these psychopathic women have called you misogynists? I know quite recently you accused me of attacking you because you insisted an entire post I had written was all about you, when it was not at all. When I explained that to you, you didn't bother to respond.
Am I one of these psychopaths? I don't recall every calling you a misogynist. I have, however, pointed to some of your own posts and even things you had said about me personally. My sense was that you seemed to think I should bear those accusations without holding it against you in anyway. You told me the only place I could respond to such posts where you made them, only you make them in a safe haven group from which you have banned me. You refused to discuss any of this the last time you made a similar charge against me. I recall another time you accused me of calling you something awful after I had referenced your previous posts. I called you nothing. I simply pointed out what you posted and on another occasion simply provided links with limited commentary. In my experience, you invent charges that others--at least I--have not leveled. You become angry when I point to your previous posts on subjects like rape and accuse me of insulting you simply by mentioning them.
Additionally, perhaps you can explain why you consider it acceptable to insult feminists on this site you refer to disdainfully as "radical feminists" and "psychopaths" who spew "bile," yet no one should ever say anything against you or anything you interpret as being about you, even when your name isn't mentioned?
I'll help you out by giving you the definition of psychopath:
It doesn't say failure to assuage the ego of someone who has continually expressed contempt for the alleged psychopath. It doesn't say refusal to accept continual insults from someone without objecting or responding in anyway. It doesn't say refusal to understand that the DU member named Bonobo should under no circumstances be challenged or reminded of anything he himself has recently posted.